The Redemption of Stephen Strasburg…and Dave Martinez

November 2nd, 2019

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

Dmart2

Redemption stories in sports are like the biblical prodigal son.

The Washington Nationals winning the World Series gives us several from which to draw. Howie Kendrick as the journeyman who actually was the last out as a Dodger two years ago in the World Series against the same Astros. This year he was NLCS MVP and drove in the winning run in Game 7 of the World Series.

Then there is Gerardo Parra, who after being released by my Giants signed with the Nats at their lowest point, and by all accounts immediately became the spirit booster in the Nats clubhouse. His enthusiasm spread to the fanbase with the Baby Shark tune, which has become an anthem among some international protest movements. He supplemented that by being their most reliable bat off the bench.

There is Ryan Zimmerman, the Dean of the Nats, and the Washington franchise’s first ever draft pick in 2005. He was once compared to Brooks Robinson as a 3rd basemen. Then the injuries and throwing hiccups came, and while the bat has always remained formidable, his place as a potential all-time great was missed.

All good stories but for me the two that resonate most are those of Stephen Strasburg and Manager Dave Martinez.

Oct 29, 2019; Houston, TX, USA; Washington Nationals pitcher Stephen Strasburg throws a pitch against the Houston Astros  in the first inning in game six of the 2019 World Series at Minute Maid Park. Mandatory Credit: Mike Ehrmann/Pool Photo via USA TODAY Sports

Oct 29, 2019; Houston, TX, USA; Washington Nationals pitcher Stephen Strasburg throws a pitch against the Houston Astros in the first inning in game six of the 2019 World Series at Minute Maid Park. Mandatory Credit: Mike Ehrmann/Pool Photo via USA TODAY Sports

I can remember the night of Strasburg’s debut in 2010. He was hailed as the franchise savior and lived up to every expectation that night, striking out 14 Pirates over 7 innings of work. It doesn’t always work out this way. For every Tiger Woods or LeBron James, both of whom met and exceeded their expectations, there are about a dozen Michelle Wie’s. While Strasburg clearly succeeded more than Wie, the narrative always seemed to be about what he wasn’t. That was compounded when the Nats shut him down in 2012, short of the postseason, and then a monumental collapse of pitching against the Cardinals led to their elimination. It was compounded when he would suffer the very arm trouble the team was trying to protect him from a few years later. Even I had added to the narrative by saying he just wasn’t mean enough. By that I mean to say that the power pitcher must be intimidating to maximize his capacity. Strasburg has a greater arsenal than Nolan Ryan ever had and the command of Roger Clemens. What he did not have was the intimidating presence of either. Ryan and Clemens were feared by hitters. Strasburg was not because he simply did not pitch inside enough. The intent need not be to hit batters but the thought that he might is in of itself a weapon and an advantage to the pitcher.

In 2017 he turned down a postseason start against the Cubs due to illness and the narrative about his “heart” ratcheted up yet again. Even tossing 7 shutout innings in his eventual start in Chicago in an elimination game to send the series back to Washington did not quiet the whispers.

Today, as the Washington Nationals prepare to take to the streets of our nation’s capital for their World Series victory parade, there are no more whispers and the narrative is clear and without dispute or subjective to interpretation: Stephen Strasburg is the World Series MVP and one of the greatest postseason pitchers ever. His 1.46 earned run average is top 5 for pitchers with at least 7 starts. When you are on any pitching list with Sandy Koufax, you no longer need to explain yourself to anyone. He is the evolution of the hype.

DMartI am as happy for manager Dave Martinez. For years, I have been playing softball with a group of rabid baseball fans, several of whom root for the Nats. A Sunday could not pass without second guessing his handling of the bullpen or bench. I might add that they had the same criticisms of previous managers Dusty Baker, Matt Williams, and Davey Johnson. Two of those 3 I believe have Hall of Fame cases. The point is that even though the managing changed, the results were still the same. So clearly managing was not the central problem.

The second guessing of managing and coaching is baked into the sports talk culture. Given that there are 162 games plus the postseason, its understandable that it be even more so in baseball. The two most common flaws in the criticism of managers or coaches are, 1) the assumption of knowing all the factors in the decision made, and 2) an analysis of choices without an analysis of options. The latter was precisely the burden of Martinez. For most of the year, the Nats had the worst bullpen in baseball. Doolittle was hurt and Hudson was in Toronto. Those were their only two consistently reliable relievers. Even when the team was 19-31, Craig Kimbrel, one of the best closers over the past 10 years, who played that role on the 2018 World Champion Boston Red Sox, was waiting for a call. Instead, the Nats chose Fernando Rodney. No disrespect to Rodney, who has led the league in saves and has been a 3-time All-Star, but he is 42.

Martinez stayed the course with what he had. He even endured a heart health scare. The bottom line is that if Martinez’ management of the team were as much of a liability as so many claimed, the team would have never won the title.

His critics should admit that they were wrong.

I won’t hold my breath waiting for that to happen. I will say that the best response to one’s critics in sports is to win, and being the 2019 World Series Champions is something that no one can ever take from either Strasburg or Martinez.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

Football and Imperialism

October 23rd, 2019

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

thumb-26-1024x537

San Francisco Forty Niners Defensive End Nick Bosa has come up with a thing that is sure to catch on with football fans. During the team’s “conquering” of the Cleveland Browns, he symbolized planting a flag after sacking QB Baker Mayfield. He described it as payback for what Mayfield had done in college when the Oklahoma Sooners went into Columbus to beat Bosa’s Ohio State Buckeyes.

Speaking of college football, one of its fastest growing media components in popularity is something called “College Football Imperialism”. It began in 2017 and almost overnight became one of the most anticipated sports-related posts on the internet. The rules for the “Imperialism” map are pretty simple: each team is given the counties that they are closest to at the beginning of the season. If a team beats a team who was on the map the previous week, they take over all land that the team owned on the previous map.

Make no mistake about it, we football fans love the concept of Imperialism. This has long made me ponder a question that I am not sure many other sports fans consider:

Can a nation as obsessed with football as America ever reject its Imperialist foreign policies?

To ensure understanding, let’s look at the definition of Imperialism:

Imperialism is a policy or ideology of extending a country’s rule over foreign nations, often by military force or by gaining political and economic control of other areas.

Football versions of this would be anytime a team wins on the other team’s home turf. One such very memorable example was in 1983. Washington was the defending Super Bowl champions and opened the season on Monday Night Football against their long-time hated rival, the Dallas Cowboys. Washington jumped out to a 23-3 halftime lead, only to eventually lose the game 31-30.

The Cowboys had planted a flag at RFK Stadium.

Later that season in December, Washington traveled to Dallas with many of the players literally dressed in military fatigues to symbolize the pending war. The game was essentially for first place in the NFC East and likely the top seed in the playoffs. Washington crushed Dallas 31-10 and the baton for conference supremacy was officially passed from Dallas to Washington.

Washington had planted a flag in Dallas.

Washington Hall of Fame offensive lineman Russ Grimm best summarizes the idea of football domination in his Hall of Fame acceptance speech when he said, “there is no greater feeling than to be able to move a man from point A to point B, against his will”. He made this statement with the familiar intoxicating aura of power, and rightfully so, because Grimm and that whole era of Washington football, like Imperialism, was all about power.

America’s history, particularly since World War II, is riddled with examples of Imperialism. When the former Soviet Union collapsed in 1989, it marked the end of the only viable military check on US hegemony. As a result, Imperialist policy was accelerated, usually with a pretext of “spreading democracy” or “confronting terrorism” or “defending human rights”, and of course, disarming “weapons of mass destruction”. Long before World War II and the fall of the Soviet Union, the U.S. drew from the Monroe Doctrine, which essentially declared all of the Western Hemisphere to be the domain of the United States. Since the two aforementioned events, this mindset of American Exceptionalism has been extended all around the word. If that history does not convince you, consider that the U.S. maintains over 800 military bases in over 70 foreign countries and/or territories…the latter being a term in and of itself that derives from Imperialism.

One can learn as much from the fate of those who have resisted Imperialism, be it Haiti, North Korea, the Congo, Vietnam, Cuba, Iran, Grenada, Nicaragua, and this list is by no means complete. The best current example is Venezuela.

Some of you may be asking why is what happens in a foreign country important to me here? A good friend of mine suggested, with good reason, that people largely have an ALAINIMBY (as long as it’s not in my back yard) attitude toward such issues. That is the precise attitude toward the environment that has led to global warming and today’s crisis. The fact is that the current immigration issues at the U.S. border cannot be correctly understood without understanding U.S. foreign policy and its underlying corporate business interests in the country of origin of the migrants. Specifically, in Mexico and Central America, a direct line can be drawn between NAFTA, adopted in the 1990s, and today’s immigration from those regions.

Martin Luther King came to ponder the same question about U.S. Imperialism. He concluded resources being used to try to suppress the self-determination of the Vietnamese people was taking away from what could be used to combat poverty in the U.S. That was the selfish truth. The broader humanity truth is as he said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”.

Today, even though a critical mass of the American public has been convinced and “outraged” about Soviet interference in the 2016 elections, there is not anywhere near as much outrage over continued U.S. Imperialistic policies abroad. Even if one believes completely in the Soviet interference narrative, can you honestly say it wasn’t anything that the U.S. has not done all over the world on a routine basis?

Why use football as the platform to discuss this? Because the best way to engage people is to tap into that for which they already have passionate vestige. It is a huge part of how the current occupant of the White House got to where he is. If we can raise awareness about such issues, then we would have a chance to convince fans to invest a fraction of their passion for football toward informed critical thinking about our imperialist foreign policy. At that point, there is at least the chance of making some positive changes for the betterment of the world collective.

Another reason to compare and contrast football with imperialism is football’s built in anti-imperialist policy skewed toward the less developed team called the draft. The weakest teams get to pick first because they have the greatest needs. It is the polar opposite under Imperialism, where greed takes priority over need. The rich get richer, the strong get stronger, under a might makes right anti-humane endorsement of Darwinism.

To embrace America’s Imperialist foreign policy is like proposing that the New England Patriots should get the first 10 picks in the NFL Draft.

So, can American football fans reject the nation’s Imperialist foreign policy? The answer is yes.

The following two things can start the process:

  • Commit to constant independent education about world matters and the source for such education cannot be corporate media; and
  • Join an organization committed to pushing back against Imperialistic policies and pro-Imperial narratives

The wonderful part about this, is that it is not an either/or proposition. I am going to be giddy when my Steelers roll into Baltimore in December and plant a flag at M&T Bank Stadium. No one will die, nor will the human right to self-determination of those who live in the Baltimore area be usurped. In football, a visiting team can conquer with none of the real-life collateral damage of Imperialism. In world affairs, this is not the case. Our humanity moves forward when we can recognize the similarities and differences and take action accordingly.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

Chicken Little and the SB-206 Victory

October 4th, 2019

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

california-state-capitol-legislature

By now, most of you are aware of SB 206, the California bill which allows college athletes in that state to profit off THEIR image without risking losing their scholarships or eligibility. Foreseeably, the entire NCAA industrial complex opposed this and insist a protracted fight, likely to the Supreme Court. The defenders of the current NCAA model always go into their Chicken Little act when anything is remotely suggested to bring about a more just system. I call them Chicken Little because their response is very similar to those who resist raising the minimum wage with baseless scare tactics.

The following are their most common fear-mongering tropes and why they are ridiculous:

THEY GET PAID IN THE FORM OF A SCHOLARSHIP

First of all, the data has been clear for years and indicates that a college degree is declining in value. More college graduates are unemployed than at any other time in American history. It just is not what it once was, but even if it were, this response implies as if it is largess on the part of the college. Let’s be clear; be it community college, division 2 or 3, or the big-time revenue-generating programs, being a college athlete is a job that requires, between practice, games, and travel, in excess of 40 hours per week. As college athletic advisers, I can tell you that we would NEVER advise a full-time student to work that much and yet the defenders pat themselves on the back as if the scholarship is a handout for which the athletes should be grateful. They earned their scholarship and more.

IT WOULD BE UNFAIR TO OTHER COLLEGE STUDENTS

Why? Does the college marching band generate millions for the college? How about the gaming team? If they do and have commercial appeal, they should not be hindered either. But the honest truth is that neither gaming, though growing very fast, nor the marching band are generating the kind of revenue that big-time football and basketball generate. In fact, the revenues generated by football and basketball routinely fund the entire athletic department.

IT WOULD UNDERMINE TITLE 9

Title 9 is the 1972 amendment that requires gender equity on college campuses and is often used as a scapegoat by reactionary defenders of the status quo, to pit the genders against one another.  Payment would come from what athletes can independently negotiate. College-based budgets would not be affected at all. In fact, female athletes with commercial appeal could profit off their likeness, just as the males could. The great WNBA star and former UConn Huskie, Diana Taurasi, talks about how her alma mater still makes money off her and she has been gone for 15 years now.

IF THEY ARE PAID, THEY WON’T BE MOTIVATED TO STUDY AND ARE MORE LIKELY TO DROP OUT OF COLLEGE

BS! The data is clear. The number one reason students drop out of school is not a lack of motivation and it is certainly not having too much money. To the contrary, the number one reason students drop out is cost. So, how is paying them going to dull their interests? The student athlete who only came to make it to the pros is unlikely to graduate whether he/she is paid or not. And still yet, he/she will be enhanced by merely being exposed to the college environment.

NCAA Basketball: NCAA Tournament-Harvard PracticeOf course the ultimate issue is the non-profit industrial complex of college athletics. Like big time organized religion, it is structured in such a way that allows it to have the protection of being tax exempt while raking in millions of dollars. It is a thinly veiled derivative of the capitalist model and thus inherently prone to such exploitation. Until that is replaced, college athletes ought to be able to do what those who endorse the “free market” system say they believe in, which is to profit off their talents. College sports in America generates revenues in excess of $1 billion annually. The charade of amateurism will no longer be allowed to keep a portion of those revenues away from the primary generators of them, which are the athletic labor.

The cries of the status quo defenders are falling on deaf ears. The reality will soon be that the 5-star football recruit pondering Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson, or USC will likely go to sunny Southern Cal, but not just for the sun. That basketball recruit pondering Kentucky, Duke, Carolina, or UCLA will do the same. They won’t be able to beat them so they will have to join them. If they need a nudge, it may come in the way of federal legislation, which is already being crafted by former Ohio State and NFL receiver Anthony Gonzales, who is now an Ohio Congressmen.

This victory did not happen in a vacuum. It is a result of a movement all around the country from graduate students to Walmart and fast food employees to unite against an increasingly oppressive work place. The sleeping giant of exploited labor is waking up. For college athletics as well as other aspects of the the dying capitalist model, the message is clear: the gig is up!

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

Hope for the Hopeless…Even the Jets and Dolphins (9/21/2019)

September 26th, 2019

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

Dolphins-Jets

(Originally Published on September 21, 2019)

As we enter the 3rd week of the NFL season, there are nine teams that have yet to win a game. As early as it is, this typically brings about what I call “panic analysis”. This is not always a bad thing. In 1993, an 0-2 start is what prompted Cowboys owner Jerry Jones to cave to the holdout of running back Emmitt Smith and sign him to a new deal. The “Boys” would go on to repeat as Super Bowl Champions and win again after the 1995 season. That was the exception. For the most part, it’s basically Chicken Little/the sky is falling type of talk. While it is true that starting 0-2 does not bode well for a team’s playoff hopes, some just get carried away with the doom and gloom. The fact is, if a team can figure out WHY it is winless, there is enough time and football remaining to correct the problems…provided you have a decent amount of talent and GREAT coaching.

Now, of the nine teams, the Dolphins and Jets are in especially dire straits. The Dolphins have lost their first two games by a combined score of 102-10. Both games were at home. Even with the addition of the great LeVeon Bell, the Jets were already offensively challenged. Now they are down to their 3rd QB. Las Vegas sees the futility of these two teams, making them both over 3 touchdown underdogs. It is extremely rare for any NFL team to be a 3 touchdown underdog. In my nearly 40 years of being an investor on some level or another, I cannot recall two teams being this big of underdogs in the same year, let alone the same week.

With all of that said, there are historical examples that provide hope for all 9 teams to include the Dolphins and Jets to make the playoffs.

New Orleans Saints v Pittsburgh Steelers1989 Pittsburgh Steelers: This is the 30th anniversary of one such example. My Steelers had not made the playoff in 5 years and only had 1 winning season during that span. This was the longest drought in the tenure of Hall of Fame head coach Chuck Noll, whose teams won 4 Super Bowls in 6 years in the 1970s. He is still the only head coach of the Super Bowl era to repeat twice. They opened up the 1989 season getting trounced by the Cleveland Browns at home, 51-0. The team then went to Houston to lose to the Oilers 41-10. The spoiled fan base of Steeler Nation was calling for the legendary Noll’s head.

Then he turned it around.

The Steelers would go to Cleveland and beat the same Browns team that had throttled them in the season opener, 17-7. The team finished the season 9-7 and made it to the playoffs, earning another trip to Houston, where the Oilers awaited. Houston had swept the season series from the Steelers. The Steelers would win 26-23 in overtime. It would have been especially satisfying for Noll given that he absolutely detested Oilers coach Jerry Glanville.

The next week the Steelers would go to Denver and come up just short of John Elway and the Broncos, 24-23.

A team that had one of the worst starts in NFL history ended up winning 10 games, to include a road playoff victory. I considered it to be Noll’s single greatest coaching job, which is to say a lot. When the all-time greatest coaches are mentioned, Chuck Noll’s name is omitted too often.

SAN DIEGO, :  Coach Bobby Ross of the San Diego Chargers watches his team play the Arizona Cardinals 09 December in San Diego, California. Ross, who led the Chargers to their first Superbowl last year, is struggling to get his team in the playoffs this year, with a 6-8 record. The Chargers lead, 28-17, in third quarter.                            AFP PHOTO   Vince BUCCI (Photo credit should read Vince Bucci/AFP/Getty Images)

1992 San Diego Chargers: This team started the season 0-4. It had gotten so bad that head coach Bobby Ross was introduced by the team’s play-by-play announcer as the director of the Laurel and Hardy Show.

Then he turned it around.

The Chargers would go on to win 11 of the final 12 to make it to the playoffs, where they would beat the division rival Chiefs before bowing to Dan Marino and the Miami Dolphins in the conference semi-finals. That Chargers team is the only team in NFL history to start a season 0-4 and still make the playoffs. NOTE: My Steelers would have pulled the trick in 2013 but for a bad call between the Chiefs and Chargers, even by the league’s admission.

This is just but one reason (in addition to his college record at both Maryland and Georgia Tech) why I consider Bobby Ross to be the most underappreciated coach in football over the past 50 years.

Of the nine teams, the one with the best chance to turn things around, in my mind, would be the Carolina Panthers. They have the best QB, when healthy, enough proven players on the defensive side from the 2015 conference champions, and are in a relatively speaking weaker division.

Does all of this mean that there is hope even for the Jets and Dolphins?

HELL TO THE NAW!  LMAO

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

Five Things to Take Away from the Antonio Brown Drama

September 12th, 2019

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

694940094001_6085444015001_6085446865001-vs

The latest news about Antonio Brown are sexual assault allegations. If true, and all data indicates that false allegations occur less than 10% of the time, this is more disturbing than any of the five items that I will list. While the emails certainly don’t make Brown look good, at the time of this writing I simply do not feel I have enough information to speak on this.

There are at least five things I do feel comfortable speaking on as take-aways from the Antonio Brown drama.

In no particular order, they are as follows:

 

  • THE NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS ARE IN THE HEAD OF THE PITTSBURGH STEELERS!

That has been clear for some time on the field, even before Sunday’s 30-3 thrashing. As great as Brown has been against the rest of the league, against the Patriots he has been “Ok”. The team is 2-5 against them since his arrival and he has averaged under 5 catches per game and has only had one 100-yard game. The fact that the Steelers may have actually passed up a better compensation package from the “Evil Empire in the Northeast” to keep Brown away from them speaks volumes. And yet he ends up there anyway, as did LaGarrett Blount and James Harrison before him;

 

  • HE LEFT $20 MILLION IN GUARANTEED SIGNING BONUS MONEY ON THE TABLE

Even if winning a ring is more important to Brown than money, is it really $20 million dollars more important? As a friend noted, this is generational wealth. The dude has 4 children. It wasn’t just about him… or at least it should not have been just about him. The thing about this on the money side is Brown could have gotten it without all this drama. Julio Jones just became the highest paid receiver in NFL history and I wouldn’t know his voice any more than Kawhi Leonard’s.

 

  • VALIDATION OF HIS NARCISSISM

The two finalists in America for Narcissist of the Decade are Donald Trump and Antonio Brown… and Brown has a chance to pull off the upset! Other than being rich, if you are on ANY list with Donald Trump, you need to take a good, long look in the mirror and not to admire yourself. If Brown, in fact, got what he wanted, this whole process has emboldened him as is. The thing to remember about the narcissistic personality type is that it is unfulfillable. Trying to satisfy and accommodate it is about as likely as filling up a black hole with dirt. For Brown’s sake, let’s hope an older and wiser Terrell Owens can connect with him about the long view and the price to be paid for one’s narcissism. The reality is that even the great Michael Jordan was humbled by the Wizards. Bill Gates is white…and was the richest man in the world when a court told him that he could not do whatever he wanted to do. Everyone must answer to someone.

 

  • THE COLLATERAL DAMAGE OF DRAMA PIMPING

The column that I was initially going to write was going to be called, “What the F%$#* is wrong with Antonio Brown?”

I reconsidered for two reasons: 1) It would be low hanging fruit, unlikely to bare any perspective not already commonly discussed and most importantly; 2) What if Brown really does have a personality disorder and isn’t just being a petulant clown?

The second is what concerns me most. I want no part of contributing to the already too neglected collateral damage from drama pimping. By drama pimping I mean the exploitation of human grief, struggles, and pain for profit.

Some will say I am embellishing the issue. If it’s just for entertainment, what’s the problem?

The problem is when manufactured drama for the exclusive purpose of entertaining is conflated with real life human struggles that are rooted in genuine mental health issues, the general public has a hard time telling the difference. Add to that the ignorance and stigma about mental health and such compounds the problem of getting those really suffering to seek treatment. Shows like Iyanla Vanzant’s Fix My Life are ground zero for this conflation.

 

  • THE PATRIOTS ARE VULTURE CAPITALISTS

The Canadian writer Naomi Klein wrote a book called the “Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism”. The book basically describes the process of how vulture capitalist takes advantage of disaster victims in desperate situations. They swoop in and devour the last bits of flesh off the carcass of the victims. They did it in Haiti, New Orleans, and are hovering over the Bahamas as we speak. The Patriots are the sports version of vulture capitalist. They rummage through the dysfunction of other organizations and when the time is right, swoop in and secure an asset for pennies on the dollar of its actual value. It’s actually a great tactic when limited to the sports world. Beyond the sports world, it’s predatory and inhumane.

The Patriots were already one of the favorites to win yet another Super Bowl. Now they are the favorites to win. It’s not as if some of the reclamation projects that the Patriots have attempted have all worked out. Chad Johnson and Albert Haynesworth come to mind. But Brown is the first of such to still be in the prime of his career and could very well push them over the top.

Like I said, none of the take-aways are good…unless you are a Patriots fan.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

Why Expanded Replay Will Not Fix NFL Officiating

September 8th, 2019

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

IR

This year will be the 20th anniversary of the NFL using replay to “get the call right”.

I don’t know anyone old enough to remember officiating before the installation of replay who thinks that it has improved the game. And yet, in no small measure to the tipping point of the Saints getting “jobbed” out of a Super Bowl appearance, the league is not only set to expand replay, but expand it in a way that second guesses the previously sacred “judgement calls”.

Last March, teams voted 31-1 to adopt a rule that will make pass interference reviewable. Based on that margin, the NFL has no idea of the Pandora’s Box it is opening.

The only thing for sure, I believe, is that this will lead to longer games.

The fundamental problem is one of mis-diagnosis. Sure, there are bad calls, and nothing can completely eliminate those. The more specific problems are the “No-calls”, which is what happened in last year’s NFC title game, and almost certainly sent the wrong team to the Super Bowl.

When the diagnosis is wrong, so too will be the treatment.

I’ll go as far as to say that expanded NFL replay will not only fail to improve officiating, but that replay in and of itself has made officiating worst.

To understand my contention, we should leave the realm of football and consider entertainers of another type:

The Flying Wallendas.

As many of you know, the Wallenda family has been walking high wires for years. One of the things that attract many to their exploits is the lack of a safety net. Either they get it right or they could literally die, as was the case with Karl Wallenda in 1978. As tragic as that was, given that there have been seven generations tempting fate, it is beyond remarkable that there haven’t been more fatalities. I attribute that to the conditions and environment in which they perform. Because there is no safety net, there is no place for complacency. Focus is not optional but is a lifesaving necessity.

In the NFL, instant replay has become a safety net for officials. I don’t necessarily believe this to be a conscious thing. In fact, I believe that the subconscious is even more intractable. Just as I do not believe the Wallendas would be as focused if they knew that there was not a safety net below them, I do not believe that NFL officials would miss as much if they did not have instant replay.

To put it another way, I do not believe that Prince would have taught himself how to play 27 different instruments had the technology of today existed when he came up. Necessity and conditions greatly influence performance.

Add to this the fact that officials were emboldened during their last work stoppage by how abysmal their replacements were and the embarrassment it caused the league. There is a correlation between one’s notion of how much he is needed and his complacency.

In the case of many, such as recently retired Ed Hochuli, who is an attorney and worth about $6 million, officiating was never vital to his financial wellbeing.

So how do we fix NFL officiating?

 

  • I believe the answer is counter-intuitive. We don’t need to expand replay, we need to reduce replay. It should be limited to inbounds, scoring, and turnovers. That is it. Some may contend that first downs should be included. If you do you are extending the game;
  • Fire the bad ones. A $200K a year weekend gig in which you keep your league paid travel miles and only work 6 months out of the year is a privilege, not a right. Most officials are like Hochuli and have day jobs. They will survive.
  • Understand that perfection is not the enemy of the good. No system is going to eliminate all bad and missed calls. If you want to make EVERYTHING reviewable within the last 2 minutes of the game, fine. That would have corrected the missed call between LA/NO.

An acronym for the NFL is “not for long”. Players and coaches have long known this if they did not perform. It should have the exact same meaning for officials.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

Charlie Brown and Those Who Believe in the Jay-Z, NFL Partnership

August 23rd, 2019

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

JZ

Over the past 3 years, I have written 6 different columns related to Colin Kaepernick.

My guess is that anyone who wanted my view could go to War Room Sports to read them and get a pretty good idea about my thoughts on the matter. Simply put, I am not sure that I have anything new to add to the discussion about the recently announced Jay-Z partnership with the NFL. Ironically, the column that most reflects my thoughts about this union wasn’t actually written about Colin Kaepernick.

CBIt was about Charlie Brown and Lucy.

Essentially, I compared sports fans of Washington DC teams to Charlie Brown trying to kick the football held by Lucy. No matter how much history and evidence that she would always pull the ball away just as old Chuck approached, the fans believed this time would be different.

Those who believe in the Jay-Z and NFL partnership are like Charlie Brown.

They go through intellectual contortions to rationalize embracing it as a substantive response to the issues raised by Kaepernick. Contortions that the great gymnast Simone Biles could not reproduce.

The most common tropes are as follows:

  • This is chess not checkers; as if Jay-Z has some Machiavellian strategy that will secure the elimination of police brutality and other forms of oppression;
  • If you are not at the table you are on the menu; which makes merely being in the presence of power the goal rather than wielding power toward the elimination of cannibalism; or
  • Let’s give it a chance and wait and see; which sounds like a form of faith described in the book of Hebrews. The problem with this is that there is no substance of what is hoped for, nor evidence of things not seen.

Then there are those who espouse that maybe Jay-Z will secure some business set asides. To that I ask, for whom? The other Black folks who are among the 1 percent, which are not as impacted by the issues Kaepernick raised? Or maybe preferential hiring of Black folks for seasonal minimum wage jobs with no benefits in stadiums, that essentially codify the working poor?

Upon what track record are these hopes based? It seems above question that Jay-Z has been very supportive of the families directly impacted by police brutality. That is a positive contribution that should not be dismissed.

It is also on the back end of the oppressive process.

JZ

To the extent that poverty has been criminalized in America, gentrification and the displacement that accompanies it is one of those foundational issues. Any analysis of the construction of the Barclays center in Brooklyn must conclude that Jay-Z was the primary pitchman for the project to the community and little to none of the promises made to sell the project were kept. In the process, a whole bunch of Black people were moved out. They are no less homeless or otherwise displaced just because a Black face was central in the causing their exodus.

Jay-Z’s take away: less than 1% percent ownership in the Nets plus whatever profit he gained from its eventual sale. Should we be hopeful because it amounts to more than 30 pieces of silver?

I just don’t understand what about this warrants hope. In fact, this partnership is about as organic as an arranged marriage. I would go as far as saying it was foreseeable and straight out of the textbook on Sedating an Uprising 101. In chapter 1, it is clearly outlined that the ruling class throw the masses one whom they like to quell the revolt. That person discourages any further radical descent suggesting that any and all solutions must come from the very systems that are at the root of the problems to begin with.

In the end, the only people to benefit will be Jay-Z, his class comrades, who will be the only ones to make out from any business goodies secured, and the NFL shield, which provides cover for the “owners”.

As sobering as it is to come to the reality of how little this partnership will make a difference, it is as important to understand those who espouse the aforementioned tropes. They are as follows:

  • Affinity cheerleaders are those who think that Jay-Z will advocate for them just because he is
    Black….the demographic disproportionately adversely affected by the issues raised by Kaepernick. If you believe that you are engaging in willful naivety. Same skin is not always kin. It should be remembered that affinity is broader than just race. It can include gender, religion, etc.;
  • Cult of personality followers are those who are so obsessed with the person that they refuse to engage in any critical analysis of the person’s behavior and record. Anytime the word cult is used to describe a group, it is not good;
  • Opportunists are those who know nothing of substance will come from the partnership but see the platform as an opportunity to advance their own individualistic agenda. In this sense they are not Charlie Brown. Such are among the least trustworthy personalities in that they are not driven by any set of principles or have any interests in changing the systems of oppression, but only advancing their own place within such systems;

An underlying factor in all of the above is a lack of class analysis, which explains why poor Black folks think a billionaire rapper is on their side.

There is a hope.

Within 2 months of writing the Charlie Brown piece about the futility of Washington sports fans rooting for their teams, the Capitals won their first Stanley Cup title. So maybe I don’t know what the hell I am talking about! So, to all of those who believe that this partnership is something positive, go ahead take a run and try to kick the damn ball yet again. Lucy represents Jay-Z and the NFL. Charlie Brown represents you!

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

Time to Grant Hall of Fame Pardons to the Old Raiders

August 21st, 2019

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

raiderslegends08wg-1_large

Yet another old Raider has passed away without getting his just NFL Hall of Fame (HOF) call.

This time it was wide receiver Cliff Branch at the age of 71. A few years ago, it was his longtime quarterback (QB) Kenny “Snake” Stabler, whom was not inducted until after death.

Along with Bob Hayes, Branch, more than any other track athlete, made the successful transition to impact NFL receiver. He was one of the most feared deep threats of his era and unlike Renaldo Nehemiah, whom the 49ers attempted to convert, Branch could actually catch.

The case for Branch is so simple, even a die-hard Steeler fan who hated the local Northern California Raiders at the height of their storied 70s rivalry, can acknowledge its merits. I can say without hesitation that Branch was as every bit as good as Steelers HOF receiver Lynn Swann. His career numbers are better and he certainly had more longevity.

There has been a disturbing trend of former Raiders with legitimate, though debatable, HOF claims, who have died without getting the call.

The list includes the following:

 

  • Defensive End Lyle Alzado passed away in 1992. He was a Raider in mindset long before coming to the team. His pass rushing was elite, but difficult to document because the stats were not kept until 1982, which was the later part of his career. During that strike-shortened 9 game season of 1982, Alzado had 7 sacks as a pass rushing specialist;
  • Safety Jack Tatum died in 2010 and was simply one of the most intimidating players in NFL history. He laid the groundwork for other hard-hitting safeties, such as Ronnie Lott, Kenny Easley, and Sean Taylor. All were better players than Tatum, but Tatum held his own with 37 career interceptions, including a career-high 7 in his final season. They called him “The Assassin”;
  • Tight End Todd Christensen passed away in 2013 and was a 5-time Pro Bowler, with numbers remarkably similar to those of fellow Raider Dave Casper, who is in the HOF and whom he replaced. He led the league in receptions twice.

Then there is offensive lineman Steve Wisnewski, who at least is alive, and was an 8-time Pro-Bowler.

A case can be made for Tom Flores being one of only 3 men to both play for and be head coach on a Super Bowl (SB) winning team. He was among the first Latino starting QBs. My apprehension on Flores is his unremarkable Seattle coaching tenure. His induction would bring other 2-time situational SB winning coaches like George Seifert and Mike Shanahan screaming bloody murder, and neither of them is deserving.

Then there are those Raiders that their fan base lobby for without merit, to include Lester Hayes and Jim Plunkett.

Hayes had 20 interceptions in a two-year period to include 13 in 1980, when he won Defensive Player of the Year. Here is the secret about corners with a lot of interceptions: it tells you that offenses know that they can be beat. HOF corners Deion Sanders, Darryl Green, and Mike Haynes never led the league in interceptions. Why? Because QB’s knew the juice wasn’t worth the squeeze. The Raiders would learn of Hayes’ flaws after 1980, when the league would outlaw the stickem Hayes used excessively. It led them to acquire Haynes in 1983. From that point forward, Hayes never had to cover a number 1 receiver.

Jim Plunkett was one of the truly great comeback stories in NFL history in 1980. Nothing can ever take that away. He is also among the first known Native American QBs. With that being said, he has one of the most absurd HOF cases I have ever heard. He is a classic example of giving an individual player too much credit for team/organizational accomplishments. Plunkett did not win 2 Super Bowls. The Raiders teams of which he was the QB did. Yes, he was MVP against the Eagles, but that award could have as easily gone to linebacker Rod Martin, who had 3 interceptions. He was selected to go to a total of zero pro bowls. At no time was Jim Plunkett one of the best QBs in football. Raiders fans exaggerate about Jim Plunkett the way Black Washington fans exaggerate about Doug Williams. Both were social trailblazers to some extent, and in the right place at the right time and played exceptionally well in the Super Bowl. It doesn’t make either of them Hall of Famers.

There are three primary reasons for the reluctance to recognize the Raiders. The first is the large shadow of my Pittsburgh Steelers. During the 70s the Steelers won 4 SBs to the Raiders 1 and held a 3-2 playoff edge on the Raiders. Simply put, the better team’s players have been recognized more. Steelers HOF linebacker Jack Ham was honest enough to admit that were he not a Steeler, he might not be in the HOF. The same can be said of several Celtics in the basketball HOF. The second reason is their “over the line” style of play, which many called “dirty”. I personally think that this is unfair. Short of safety George Atkinson’s assault on Swann, the Raiders were no “dirtier” than my Steelers, the 85 Bears, the Parcells era Giants, Shannahan’s cut blocking Broncos, or Buddy Ryan’s Eagles. They did embrace the image more than anyone else and I suspect that turned some HOF voters off.

fg0jrpoyoqt1jeuxbortAs I see it, by far the number one reason the Raiders have been snubbed of HOF recognition is the Godfather of “RaiderNation” himself, the late Al Davis and his endless feud with the league. Even his own HOF call was unjustly delayed. It goes back to the AFL/NFL battles for elite college players in the 1960s. If one listened to Davis, he beat the NFL every time, which is grossly misleading. He did win the legal battle to move to Los Angeles, which only added to the organization’s rebel image. As the Cowboys were marketed as America’s team, the Raiders were the team of the counter-culture. Even after the rapper Ice Cube uttered the line, “Stop givin’ juice to the Raiders Cause Al Davis never paid us”, he also admitted to how influential the team was on the Los Angeles based hip hop group NWA.

But Davis also engaged in a lot of frivolous litigation, such as suing to keep marketing rights in Los Angeles after the team had already returned to Oakland. Most of that stuff never saw the inside of a court and was summarily dismissed. This infuriated blue blood owners to include the Rooneys of Pittsburgh. Al Davis could also be petty as was clear with his feud with future HOF running back Marcus Allen.

But I suspect the die had been cast long before this. NFL ownership is the most exclusive sports club in the world and admittance to such comes with the understanding that you will go along with the program. The forces of the 1970 NFL/AFL merger got Davis admitted. Had the owners been able to vote on him alone, I suspect he would not have been accepted. He just was not “their kind of people”. He grew up a Brooklyn Dodgers fan and often envisioned his team as an NFL version of the groundbreaking organization that broke baseball’s color barrier. He was never the “go along to get along” type and for that and the cumulation of all else mentioned, his players have paid in the form of HOF snubs.

It’s time that it stopped.

Next year, to commemorate the 100th year anniversary of the NFL, the HOF class will be expanded to as many as 20. Let’s hope some long overdue and deserving Raiders get the nod. Even the Hatfields and McCoys called a truce. Surely the ghost of Al Davis, the Raiders, and HOF voters can do the same.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

The Righteous Indignation of Trent Williams

July 29th, 2019

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images

Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images

Maybe the hold out of Washington All-Pro left tackle Trent Williams is just about getting a new or reworked contract. He has 2 years left on his current deal, with cap hits of $14.7 million this year and $14.6 million in 2020.

Maybe Williams wants to be like or surpass the other Trent…as in Raiders offensive lineman Trent Brown, who became the highest paid offensive linemen in league history. He will earn $36.75 million guaranteed and an average annual salary of $16.5 million per year.

After all, he holds ALL the leverage in this situation for a number of reasons:

  • He is arguably the best left tackle in the game, which protects the typical right throwing QB’s blind side;
  • His probable replacement, Ereck Flowers’ pass blocking has been described as “a backwards skating 300 pounder”. That is an attempted humorous way of saying that he isn’t very good;
  • Instability at this position makes it all the more difficult to throw your first round QB to the wolves

If it is just about money, all of the above explain the situation and there really is nothing unique about this. A “financial apology” may smooth over all animosity.

I suspect there is more to this hold out and recent reports support my suspicion.

In the winter, Williams underwent surgery to remove a tumor from his head. It was determined to be malignant, which means that it was made up of cancerous cells.

Subsequent reports say that Williams was unhappy with how the team doctors handled his situation and some have even said he seeks a trade as opposed to playing for the team again. Due to health privacy laws, the team is limited in what it can say about this matter without Williams’ consent.

Be that as it may, Williams is not the only player unhappy with the team doctors and overall handling of injuries. Keep in mind that Washington has been the most injury-riddled team in the NFL in each of the past 2 seasons. They put 26 players on the injured reserve in 2017 and topped that with 28 in 2018.

Football is a violent game and injuries must be baked into the planning recipe. To lead the league in injuries is bad luck.

To lead the league in consecutive years is extremely abnormal.

The team has tried a number of responses, including ice made of Gatorade.

That was not an attempt at humor but is true.

There are a number of theories, including the team’s tendency to draft players with an injury history under the thinking that they would be financial bargains. Say whatever one wants about owner Daniel Snyder, but he has no history of being cheap.

All of this leads me to believe two things: 1) that the prospect of Cancer is as terrifying for a 300 plus pound multimillionaire as it would be for any one of us, and 2) that such fear made him more conscious of his medical treatment than perhaps he had been before. More than a few of his teammates have echoed his concerns and stand by him.

The NFL’s “M.O.” is to treat players the way a factory treats a conveyor belt. When they are of no more use, they are discarded and replaced. Players are not conveyor belts in a factory. They are human beings. The fact that they are very well paid human beings does not mean that they forfeit the desire to play with their grandchildren one day.

Then again, it could be just about money. I’m sure that some will utter the tired trope, “he signed a contract and he should honor his contract”. Teams cut players under contract all the time. In other words, it’s only a contract as long as the team says it’s a contract. Under those conditions, holding out is the player’s only direct leverage.

Either way, I’m on the side of the players, which is to say labor. You need go no further than the health struggles of retired players to know how little the NFL cares about its most valuable asset and how hard it has resisted the moral responsibility to take care of them. When one considers all of this, Trent Williams’ indignation is more than righteous!

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

The Big Three and Serena’s Reality

July 22nd, 2019

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

Tennis

I hope that even the peripheral tennis fan can appreciate what we are witnessing from the men’s “Big Three” of Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Novak Djokovic.

Why? Because they just may be the best threesome of athletes to overlap one another during their prime in any one sport, EVER!

When I say best three, I mean three athletes whom all have a legitimate G.O.A.T. claim.

Think about it for a bit: in baseball we had Willie Mays and Hank Aaron, and later Ken Griffey Jr and Barry Bonds, but it is hard to find a 3rd peer.

In basketball we had Michael Jordan, Magic Johnson, and Larry Bird. For all of their ambassadorship and marketing of the game, neither Magic nor Bird have a valid claim.

In football we had Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, and Drew Brees. But is there really a good argument to put either Manning or Brees over Joe Montana?

When talking about Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic, it’s hard to find “buts” to either’s claim beyond one of the other two.

No disrespect to Rod Laver, who won a calendar year grand slam in both 1962 and 1969.

All of the Big 3 have won the career grand slam.

Bjorn Borg’s capacity to go from clay to grass, winning the French Open and Wimbledon in the same year, 3 straight years, is the second hardest thing to do in tennis, behind the calendar year Grand Slam. But he never won a hard-court major.

We almost never talk about Pete Sampras and his 14 major titles. But he never won the French Open.

Other than the calendar year Grand Slam, there is nothing all 3 members of this group have not done.

How dominant have they been?

 

  • They have won 50 of the past 58 major titles.

 

  • They have all 3 made the final four of a major 12 times in 13 years. In six different years, all three made it to the final four of all the majors. If not for injuries, especially to Djokovic and Nadal, it would likely have been more.

 

  • The major title count to date is Federer with 20, Nadal with 18, and Djokovic with 16. They are ranked in reverse 1, 2, and 3 in the world.

 

Tennis’ Big Three has been to Jo Wilfried Tsonga, Tomas Berdych, and David Ferrer, what Michael Jordan was to John Stockton, Karl Malone, Charles Barkley, and Patrick Ewing.

While Federer is clearly a lion in the winter, he is still formidable. He played his A game in last Sunday’s Wimbledon final and was still not able to beat Djokovic on his B game.

The only frustrating thing about the Big Three is identifying heirs to their throne. They are all over 30 and can’t go on forever. So, who in the hell is next?

Three have the game but all have glaring flaws:

Alexander Zverev has all the tools but just seems uninterested at times and has even all but admitted as much.

Stefanos Tsitsipas also has the game but lacks experience.

And then of course there is the mercurial Nick Kyrgios, who blatantly admits that he does not train. Even with that, his record against Nadal and Djokovic is 5-4. The guy has never lost to Novak Djokovic.

On the women’s side, we Serena fans are going to have to prepare ourselves for the possibility that she may never win another major.

SWIt’s not a question of capacity. When her serve is right, she still beats every other player. The problem is that increasingly the serve is not right and her “B” game is no longer good enough to survive the unforced errors and beat upper echelon players, as it once was. There are times when I cannot get the image of Mays, Manning, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, and Muhammad Ali towards the end of their careers out of my head. I could not bear to see Serena go out the way that they did.

One of the things that makes a great athlete is a fierce stubbornness. It, likewise, is also what keeps them around beyond their greatness. She certainly has earned the right to leave when she is good and ready. I just hope she is ready before Mother Time forces the issue.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports