Posts Tagged ‘Rafael Nadal’

The Big Three and Serena’s Reality

Monday, July 22nd, 2019

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

Tennis

I hope that even the peripheral tennis fan can appreciate what we are witnessing from the men’s “Big Three” of Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Novak Djokovic.

Why? Because they just may be the best threesome of athletes to overlap one another during their prime in any one sport, EVER!

When I say best three, I mean three athletes whom all have a legitimate G.O.A.T. claim.

Think about it for a bit: in baseball we had Willie Mays and Hank Aaron, and later Ken Griffey Jr and Barry Bonds, but it is hard to find a 3rd peer.

In basketball we had Michael Jordan, Magic Johnson, and Larry Bird. For all of their ambassadorship and marketing of the game, neither Magic nor Bird have a valid claim.

In football we had Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, and Drew Brees. But is there really a good argument to put either Manning or Brees over Joe Montana?

When talking about Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic, it’s hard to find “buts” to either’s claim beyond one of the other two.

No disrespect to Rod Laver, who won a calendar year grand slam in both 1962 and 1969.

All of the Big 3 have won the career grand slam.

Bjorn Borg’s capacity to go from clay to grass, winning the French Open and Wimbledon in the same year, 3 straight years, is the second hardest thing to do in tennis, behind the calendar year Grand Slam. But he never won a hard-court major.

We almost never talk about Pete Sampras and his 14 major titles. But he never won the French Open.

Other than the calendar year Grand Slam, there is nothing all 3 members of this group have not done.

How dominant have they been?

 

  • They have won 50 of the past 58 major titles.

 

  • They have all 3 made the final four of a major 12 times in 13 years. In six different years, all three made it to the final four of all the majors. If not for injuries, especially to Djokovic and Nadal, it would likely have been more.

 

  • The major title count to date is Federer with 20, Nadal with 18, and Djokovic with 16. They are ranked in reverse 1, 2, and 3 in the world.

 

Tennis’ Big Three has been to Jo Wilfried Tsonga, Tomas Berdych, and David Ferrer, what Michael Jordan was to John Stockton, Karl Malone, Charles Barkley, and Patrick Ewing.

While Federer is clearly a lion in the winter, he is still formidable. He played his A game in last Sunday’s Wimbledon final and was still not able to beat Djokovic on his B game.

The only frustrating thing about the Big Three is identifying heirs to their throne. They are all over 30 and can’t go on forever. So, who in the hell is next?

Three have the game but all have glaring flaws:

Alexander Zverev has all the tools but just seems uninterested at times and has even all but admitted as much.

Stefanos Tsitsipas also has the game but lacks experience.

And then of course there is the mercurial Nick Kyrgios, who blatantly admits that he does not train. Even with that, his record against Nadal and Djokovic is 5-4. The guy has never lost to Novak Djokovic.

On the women’s side, we Serena fans are going to have to prepare ourselves for the possibility that she may never win another major.

SWIt’s not a question of capacity. When her serve is right, she still beats every other player. The problem is that increasingly the serve is not right and her “B” game is no longer good enough to survive the unforced errors and beat upper echelon players, as it once was. There are times when I cannot get the image of Mays, Manning, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, and Muhammad Ali towards the end of their careers out of my head. I could not bear to see Serena go out the way that they did.

One of the things that makes a great athlete is a fierce stubbornness. It, likewise, is also what keeps them around beyond their greatness. She certainly has earned the right to leave when she is good and ready. I just hope she is ready before Mother Time forces the issue.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

 

Respect, Liberation, and Novak Djokovic

Thursday, January 31st, 2019

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

ND

It was not a big surprise that World Tennis Number 1 player Novak Djokovic won the Australian Open. What was surprising was how easily he beat rival and number two ranked Rafael Nadal.

The slaughter was in straight sets 6-3, 6-2, 6-3. It was not as close as even that score indicates.

What is amazing is how dramatically Djokovic has flipped his rivalry with not only Nadal, but also with Roger Federer. He is now 28-25 against Nadal (25-22 against Federer). Those numbers look relatively even, but upon closer examination, it is clear that while the others controlled the early stages of the rivalries, “The Joker” has had the last laugh for some time now.

In the case of Nadal, Djokovic lost 14 of the first 18 matches, and the first 8 on Nadal’s “home surface” of clay. Since then, the record is Djokovic 24-11 and 8-7 on clay. They have met in 25 finals. Nadal won the first five but is 5-15 since. Djokovic owns the longest winning streak at seven straight.

So essentially, Nadal dominated only the first third of the rivalry. It has been Djokovic ever since.

A similar pattern is there against Federer, who won the first four matches over Djokovic and seven of the first nine. Since then, it has been Djokovic with a 23-15 advantage and an overall 13-6 record in finals.

So the question is how did Djokovic so dramatically “flip the script”? I believe the answer lies in a 60 Minutes interview from 2012. When asked about Federer and Nadal, Djokovic readily admitted that he had a great deal of respect for them…”maybe too much”.

BINGO!

Respect is an admirable thing among peers. However, that quality will not serve you well when trying to get out from under someone else’s thumb. In fact, it is an albatross. Consider the story Michael Jordan tells about his first time facing Shaquille O’Neal. He readily admitted being intimidated by Shaq’s size alone. The first time MJ went to the hole, his fear was validated when Shaq put him on the floor. Then Shaq made a crucial mistake: he helped MJ get up. That told Jordan that in spite of his superior power and capacity to do serious harm to him, Shaq had too much respect for him to ever really impose on him the way he could.

Be it in sports or liberation efforts, if you want to get someone’s foot off your neck, respecting them is not the way to go. It must be kept in mind that the oppressor benefits from the current state of affairs and will NEVER voluntarily surrender the place of power. Oh they may appear beneficent and agree to modify the manifestation of the oppression, such as was the case in South Africa. However, rest assured, the domination remains and will until those under the foot rise up.

Various writers and thinkers from Franz Fanon to Naim Akbar and even Malcolm Gladwell have clearly illustrated that a prerequisite to changing one’s objective material condition is the changing of one’s subjective psyche about the condition.

Free your mind, the rest will follow.

I would go as far as to say that hate for your oppressor will get you a much greater return toward liberation than respect for them. At least hate can be used as fuel to do what needs to be done.

Once Djokovic figured this out about Federer and Nadal, in about 2011, he has not looked back. Even elbow surgery about a year ago has not suppressed him. Today he is number one again, and for the second time in his career will go into the French Open holding three major titles, and a chance to be the first to hold all four since Rod Laver did so in 1969. It will be no small task with a slew of clay court specialist standing in his way, to include 2018 finalist Dominic Theim and the defending champion and 11-time winner Rafael Nadal.

None of this would have been possible had Djokovic not changed his mind about his situation and those on top of him. So, for those serious about liberation, in simple terms, stick a middle finger up at the one with their foot on your neck.

You may end up being the public villain, as Djokovic often is, but you will also be a lot closer to where you want to be.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

The One Thing the Umpire Couldn’t Take from Serena

Wednesday, September 12th, 2018

by Jaesun D. Campbell

JC

 

 

 

 

 

 

SW

I’ve not said shit about what happened to Serena at the U.S. Open, but let me be clear. The warning, point, and game penalty are all legitimate tennis “fouls”, and were correctly applied in the order in which they’re supposed to be applied… *takes deep breath*

HOWEVER, after 20+ years of playing, it’s notoriously known that Serena doesn’t and hasn’t ever got on-court coaching, even when it’s allowed and she’s losing. Never.

You’ve got to keep in mind that this is the woman who was so blatantly cheated in a 2004 U.S. Open quarterfinal, that the umpire was dismissed, and they were forced to implement a system to challenge the line calls.

This is no exaggeration. I’ve watched tennis for the past 18 years or so, like clockwork. No exaggeration… I’ve watched in class, church, school, clubs, parties, gatherings, probates, the shower (don’t ask), and even at work; and I’ve NEVER seen a player go from a warning to point penalty to game penalty in a matter of games, let alone the same set.

Sound judgment was not applied here. It’s a Grand Slam Final and a player is going for an all-time record in her sport, and you chose to apply the rules THAT tough? The officiating was horrid. Never once did Carlos Ramos attempt to explain what a coaching violation entails (remember, she’s never gotten one). Also, after Serena tells him she’s never cheated, he nodded her off as if they were squared away but then assessed her a point for the racquet smash, and still didn’t explain how or why he did it. Communication is paramount but even NBA Refs take the time to fully explain a call to a player or coach if/when need be.

Am I about to play the “but this player did that…” game? Yes, yes I am.

Novak Djokovic is notoriously known for yelling at his player’s box and at ball kids, however no name-calling or mockeries are hurled at him.

Karolina Pliskova lost a match after getting a bad call on a clay court and at the end of the match she and the umpire did not shake hands, and she proceeds to whack the chair the umpire is sitting in 3 times with her racquet, frightening her opponent. No suspension or outcries for bad behavior.

Rafael Nadal threatened to have the same umpire from Saturday removed from his matches and said some not-so-nice Spanish words. No penalty, no warning.

“What the hell is wrong with you?” – Novak Djokovic, as he waves his racquet (not finger) in his direction, to the same man who took such offense to Serena calling him a “thief”, that he gave her a game penalty.

Was Serena out of line? Perhaps… but for the last 20+ years, her skills have been belittled to brute strength instead of IQ and strategizing, and rumors of steroids. She’s been called “a man”, “tranny”, “hermaphrodite”, as well as being told to play on the men’s tour, mocked for her body, called racial slurs, disrespected by peers, coaches, and commentators alike; yet, regardless of it all, they’ve never been able to question the legitimacy of her incredible win/loss record, and how she’s solved many puzzles.

What you saw on Saturday wasn’t a meltdown or a simple overreaction. It was a Black woman holding on to the one piece of her reputation that has never been questioned. If you’ve never faced persecution for things beyond your control (upbringing, body type, skin tone, etc…), save me the self-righteousness regarding Serena Williams.

The very thing that’s made Serena Williams, Serena Williams, is how many times she’s been on the brink of defeat and found ways to win. Yes, she was losing when this debacle took place, but the umpire inserting himself the way he did took away from Osaka’s win or potentially one of the most special comebacks in Serena’s career. One thing he couldn’t take was Serena Williams’ desire to stand up for herself, and she did exactly that.

Jaesun D. Campbell, for War Room Sports