Posts Tagged ‘WRS’

The World Cup, Africa, and Why I Wish Serena Would Not Bow

Saturday, June 30th, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

Super-Eagles-Celebrate

Even as a casual soccer fan, it is hard for me to watch the World Cup, the most popular sporting event worldwide, without wondering what could be for African Nations. Despite African-born or heritage players on many teams, especially European teams, no nation from Africa has ever won the cup. Despite the events’ widely acknowledged greatest player in its History, Brazil’s Pele, being himself of African descent and forecasting that an African nation would win the cup by 2000, none have even made it to the semi-finals.

But why?

Some will cite a structural reason that is clearly biased toward Europe.  There are 54 countries in Africa and yet it is only allocated five slots in the World Cup tournament. Conversely, Europe has 50 countries and gets 13 slots.

Still, others will cite the same ole dog whistle analysis to explain why African countries have not succeeded to the level of its enormous talent and resources; bad governance, undisciplined players…blah, blah, blah. I do not contend that none of those are factors. I actually would agree that bad governance compounds the issue. I only argue that they are not at the root. At the root are the same factors responsible for the continent’s underdevelopment in general and that is the exploitation by foreign interests, especially Europe.

For a point of reference, look at how U.S. baseball pillages Latin American baseball talent…compound that worldwide and that is what you have with European countries and the African soccer players.

To be fair, European countries are not the only culprits. Qatar has recently indulged as well, under the guise of humanitarian motivations with its Aspire Academy, which recruits young African soccer players to their country in their effort to build a World Cup contender.

However, my primary focus is Europe, due to its wider history of exploiting Africa for both human and material resources, and the wealth it accumulated as a result.

SWThat brings us to Serena Williams and the pending Wimbledon Tennis tournament. She has won this tournament seven times, and each time before being crowned is “required” by tradition to do some curtsy to the Queen of England. It strikes me as bowing and I have always had a serious problem with that practice.

The Industrial Revolution would have been impossible without the wealth generated by slave labor. Britain’s major ports, cities, and canals were built on invested slave money. Several banks, to include Barclays, as well the Church of England built their wealth on the slave trade of African free labor. In other words, the ancestors of Serena Williams.

Indeed, as the great scholar Eric Williams illustrates clearly in “Capitalism and Slavery”, you cannot speak of one without speaking of the other.

Please save the tired apologist responses such as, “We cannot rewrite history”. Rewriting history is not the issue. Collecting on the debt is. We validate this right for the decedents and survivors of the Holocaust, as well we should. However, when it comes to African people, we adapt the “let bygones be bygones” approach. This mindset was on blatant display when the British offered to “lend” Nigerian art back to Nigeria…art it stole during the colonial era.

Let that sink in for a moment.

That is like a crackhead carjacking you and then offering to lend you your own car.

I know that Serena refusing to bow to the Queen of England will not address the massive debt owed to African people by England. I just want the issue raised in the consciousness of the world and she would have the platform to do just that.

My thinking on this issue was greatly influenced by a dear friend and mentor who passed away last Saturday. Macheo Shabaka introduced me to the concept of Pan Africanism, which insist that we of African descent, regardless of where we were born, are still Africans, and obliged to act on her and her people’s behalf. If we don’t, who will? Were he still alive, he would agree with me when I say that Serena Williams should not bow to the Queen of England. In fact, the Queen and all of England should bow to her and all of Africa and her peoples.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

What Do Allen Iverson and Voters Have in Common?

Thursday, June 21st, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

AI

The primary voting season is here. While many will think of the local State’s Attorney’s race or in DC, Proposition 77 – aimed at increasing the income of restaurant workers, what I think of in addition to those things is the NBA Hall of Famer and DMV icon Allen Iverson.

Stay with me.

Generously listed at 6 feet, not only was Iverson one of the most exciting basketball players of any era, but he was one of the best high school athletes the country has EVER seen.  In addition to being an 11-time NBA All-Star, 2-time All-Star game MVP, and the 2001 NBA MVP, Iverson was an all-state quarterback in the talent-rich Hampton Roads area of Virginia. Three days after leading his high school to the state title in football, he made his basketball debut for the year….scoring 47 points! He was the Associated Press High School Player of the Year in both football and basketball.

Under the inch-for-inch, pound-for-pound criteria, Iverson would be very high on the list of best all-around athletes of my lifetime.

In addition to that, Iverson was iconic among the Hip Hop culture, in no small part to his refusal to modify who he was, warts and all, in exchange for commercial endorsements. Simply put in the eyes of his fans, Iverson kept it real.

I have played softball with a person for several years whom I call, “the Question”. Why? Because I never knew if he would be where he is supposed to be.  Allen Iverson’s nickname was “THE ANSWER”, because on game day, regardless of injuries and being literally the smallest person on the court, you knew Iverson came to play and play with no fear. Even against the likes of Shaq, who was literally more than twice his size, Iverson would go to the hole without hesitation.

The only time you could not count on “an Answer” was during practice. He was so uninterested in it that his coach in Philadelphia, the great Larry Brown, finally called him out about the matter to the media. Iverson responded at a press conference with one of the most memorable sports quotes ever…

“We’re sitting in here, and I’m supposed to be the franchise player, and we in here talking about practice. I mean, listen, we’re talking about practice, not a game, not a game, not a game, we talking about practice. Not a game. Not, not … Not the game that I go out there and die for and play every game like it’s my last. Not the game, but we’re talking about practice, man. I mean, how silly is that? … And we talking about practice. I know I supposed to be there. I know I’m supposed to lead by example… I know that… And I’m not.. I’m not shoving it aside, you know, like it don’t mean anything. I know it’s important, I do. I honestly do… But we’re talking about practice man. What are we talking about? Practice? We’re talking about practice.”

Jim SmithThis is why Iverson reminds me of all too many voters. The less repeated part of the quote was the fact that he knew that he was wrong and acknowledged such. However, my feeling is that rarely before had anyone actually demanded more from him. He viewed games the way many voters view elections. In addition, both have the same fatal flaw and that is the failure to realize that the work before and in between the games and elections is how best to get results from the games and elections.

Though I played multiple sports growing up, I did not fully appreciate the significance of practice until I began to coach. Likewise, though I have voted all my adult life, the more politically conscious I become, the more I realize that the critical work is ongoing before, in between, and after elections. It’s constant political education, holding both police and elected officials accountable, be they Barack Obama or the current president, and even non-electoral organizing work.

So I say to you voters as I would say to Iverson; we are not just talking about practice. We are not just talking about elections. We are talking about putting in that grind and the hard, thankless work when no one is watching. Had we been as engaged out of election season as we are during the election season, maybe we could have prevented the conditions that allowed for the election of the current President of the United States. Just as it was always about more than practice, it has always been about more than voting.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

The Long and Enduring Climb of the Washington Capitals

Wednesday, June 13th, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

WC

About a month ago, several of you may recall a column I penned called “Charlie Brown, Lucy, and Washington Sports Fans”, in which I analogized DC area sports fans as hopelessly doomed for disappointment as the Peanuts character in his never-ending attempts to kick the football held by Lucy. While all four of the major sports teams have contributed to the agony of long-suffering DC fans, without question, the Washington Capitals were the biggest culprits. So perhaps it is fitting that for the first time since 1992, the team that had teased Washington sports fans the most, finally rewarded them when the Caps won their first Stanley Cup Championship in franchise history.

Charlie Brown finally kicked the damn ball!

Moreover, they did it in true Caps style…..giving their fans a heart attack in the process. They were down in every series, forced to slay the longtime nemesis Pittsburgh Penguins, had key players suspended, loss 3 straight games to Tampa, and still somehow clinched every series on the road, including a game 7. In other words, in every area that this franchise had historically failed so often to the point that its fans could anticipate the doom, this team passed with excellence. The Caps’ 10 road wins ties four other teams for the most in a single postseason.

However, you must be around hardcore Caps fans to really appreciate what it meant. This is from just such a fan:

“I have rooted for the Caps since the 1993-94 season. They lost in the second round of the playoffs that year to the New York Rangers. It was upsetting at the time, but I had no idea how many years of frustration it would be after that. There certainly have been a lot of players since then….The 1998 Stanley Cup Final run brought out the best in Olie Kolzig, Adam Oates, Joe Juneau, and my favorite, Peter Bondra….There was the failed Jaromir Jagr experiment and the many promising but ultimately faltering goalies….For a long time it seemed like the Ovechkin era would go the same way. The core players were great, but after many years of failure it seemed like they, too, were destined to be a great regular season team with no chance of winning it all. I had resigned myself to waiting another 15-20 years, long after the Ovechkin era was over, before the Caps would have any chance of making another run.

And then this year’s playoffs began.

At first, it was more of the same, losing two to the Columbus Blue Jackets (at home). But then something clicked in Game 3 and they never looked back. Anytime they had their backs against the wall, someone new stepped up. If it wasn’t Ovechkin, it was Backstrom, Carlsson, Oshie, or Holtby. Or it was an unexpected source, like Eller, Smith-Pelley, or Beagle. Hell, even Brooks Orpik played well when we needed him! I didn’t want to hope, but I knew something was different about this team than any Caps team I have ever seen. They had grit, resiliency, and patience on top of talent, and the result was different from any Caps team I’ve ever seen. A lot has happened in since 1993-94, good and bad. The world is a much different place then when I was 14, watching my first hockey playoffs. But after all of the heartache and frustration, after all of the times having my hopes raised and then dashed, I am finally able to say, after 25 years of pulling for them, that the Washington Capitals are Stanley Cup Champions. Cheers.” – Tom Goldstein

None of this is to suggest that sports will bring about world peace, justice for oppressed people, or a cure for cancer. It most certainly will not. However, what it can do is provide hope for the human spirit and as a well-read book says, “A man without hope is most miserable.”

So add the Caps to a list that includes Caroline Wozniaki and Simona Halep for winning their first major tennis titles and the Philadelphia Eagles for winning its first Super Bowl this year. All are symbols that no matter how many let downs or how much frustration, if we keep getting up and we are willing to struggle, someday we can be champions and win a better world.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

How to Bring NFL Owners to Their Knees

Saturday, May 26th, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

Image courtesy of USAToday.com

Image courtesy of USAToday.com

How is that protesting the NFL working for you?

If the unilateral policy change handed down by NFL owners, which banned the kneeling sparked by Colin Kaepernick during the National Anthem is any indication, it is not working too well.

Then and again, the protesting tactic of not watching or going to games never had much of a chance to have the impact those who advanced it sought.  Why? Because the demographics of those most directly impacted by the police brutality that Kaepernick and others were protesting simply do not make up enough of the season ticket holders and television viewing audience to have made a dent in NFL profits. About 77% of NFL fans are Caucasian, compared to 15% being African-American/Black, and 8% being Hispanic. Maybe immigrants and others most adversely affected by police brutality may make up another 2%, which puts the number at 25%.

While 1 out of 4 is not insignificant, it will not make a difference because the appetite for the NFL, even with declining TV ratings, still far outpaces that of its competitors. Think of it like the difference between the wholesale and retail price. The mark up is so high that when they claim to be having a sale, the consumer is duped into thinking he or she got a bargain, when in fact the seller had plenty of room to drop the price and still walk away way ahead. Does anyone really believe that networks are going to drop out of the business of broadcasting NFL games? Does anyone believe that advertisers will decide to try to reach customers through bowling rather than football?

As for season ticket holders, let us say all those from the most affected groups decide today to give up their tickets. Have you seen the waiting list for season tickets in places like New England, Dallas, Washington, Pittsburgh, Green Bay, and New York? They would be replaced without a blink of an eye. Moreover, the NFL has moved in the same direction as the larger society, which accommodates the privileged through corporate suites etc. at the expense of the dwindling working and middle-class customers, who have not been already priced out of season tickets. Simply put, as long as the money keeps rolling in, NFL owners could not care less what those affected by police brutality think or feel, and they certainly do not care about the freedom of speech rights of its labor. It really was no surprise that the owners did not even bother to consult the NFL Players Association about the policy change. They have been emboldened by the recent Supreme Court ruling against labor that allows class-action waivers in favor of arbitration agreements to be a condition of employment. There is no reason to believe the right-leaning court will not rule against labor again in the upcoming “Janus” case, which seeks to literally bust unions.

Image courtesy of the NY Daily News

Image courtesy of the NY Daily News

So how can we bring NFL owners to their knees to both lift the obvious blackballing of Kaepernick and get on the right side of history regarding police brutality? First, we have to accurately access whom we are up against. Righteous indignation and well-meaning passions are not substitutes for effective tactics. The 32 NFL owners are not just any part of the 1 percent. They are especially powerful among that 1 percent. To use the mafia analogy, these are MADE MEN and anyone that knows “the code” knows that going up against a “Made Man” often creates more problems than it solves. Because these men are extraordinarily powerful, any tactics used to bring them to their knees must be extraordinarily powerful, and the only one that I can think of would be the withholding of NFL player labor.

There is some recent precedent. When the University of Missouri football players refused to play until issues of institutional racism were acknowledged and addressed, then and only then did the college get serious about the issues. Can you imagine what would happen if even a quarter of the Black NFL players refused to play until Kap was back in the league and other larger issues regarding police brutality were addressed? Some of the very intractable issues that grassroots groups have been struggling to address would be done almost overnight. Keep in mind that during WW2, the Russians were US allies while the Germans, Italians, and Japanese were enemies. By 1950, within 5 years of the end of the war, the entire narrative flipped in the minds of the general public, as did foreign policy. The Russians became the enemies while the Germans, Japanese, and Italians became allies. Power can do whatever power wants to do, when it is compelled by a people’s movement to do so. The people with the most leverage in this case against NFL owners are the players.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

The Demons of Sports Gambling are Dead

Thursday, May 17th, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

Image via Reason.com

Image via Reason.com

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 vote to strike down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act is a victory for sports “investors”. This opens the flood gates for legalized sports wagering in every state that chooses…….and rest assured most will. To think otherwise is to think that they will leave a trunk full of cash on the table.

For years, this issue has been haunted by the Demons of Sports Gambling, who are as follows: Addiction; Integrity; Sin. Let’s condemn all three to heaven…..I mean to hell, once and for all.

The Demon of Addiction insists that legalized sports gambling will increase the number of folks addicted, especially youth. This sinister troll from hell’s bunker totally misrepresents the essence of addiction, which is a form of self-medication. Since self-medication is its objective, it will engage in such behavior, be it through sports gambling, substance abuse, shopping, sex, or whatever other vice might be at its disposal. The continued suppressing of legalized sports only insures that another vice will be used.

Then there is the Demon of Integrity, which supposedly undermines the authenticity of the game. This abomination of truth is an outdated relic from the era when professional athletes were paid so little that most had to take off season jobs. Those days are long gone. Simply put, today’s professional athletes make so much money, to the point that they are virtually bribe-proof. In fairness, such is not the case for college athletes, and they would indeed still be vulnerable to this dishonest specter. But this is all the more reason to continue the movement to pay them as well.

The third Demon and arguably the most powerful is Sin. His powers are the broad default of the anti-sports gambling fringe. When his demon cousins of Integrity and Addiction fail, Sin is always there to pick up the mantle and be cited, even though most of his advocates cannot tell you exactly what the hell is wrong with a little sports action. Furthermore, a significant number of Sin’s advocates never miss Wednesday night’s church Bingo game. This Demon is but another example of how Sin has been unfairly tarnished for all of world history. If Sin were so bad, why do all of us indulge?

None of this is to say that there will be no victims of nationwide legal sports gambling. One will be the underground betting world, which has been primarily the domain of organized crime. By legalizing sports gambling, the worst the degenerate has to concern him with is a dinged FICO score or garnished paycheck. But he no longer must look over his shoulder for fear that Guido will break his knee caps.

The other loser will be off-shore gambling which has primarily taken place online. One report cites that one off shore entity currently gets 97% of its action from Americans.

But these are off-set by the projected $8.4 billion in new tax revenues and over $22 billion to the nation’s GDP. I’ll not cite the new jobs added because most will be minimum or non-living wage service industry jobs with little, if any, benefits. But still the math is in the black on this issue.

What is most frustrating about this issue is why the hell has it taken this long? We have a historical precedent called prohibition that made it crystal-clear that trying to suppress human urges by law NEVER work. In fact, the case can be made that by attempting to do so, one only increases whatever negative aspects of the behavior and activity that do exist. There is nowhere to go to resolve an unpaid, illegal bet. So let’s finally be adults and accept that folks are going to gamble…be it legal or illegal. The only reasonable plan is to bring the activity above ground, tax and regulate the inevitable.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

Harden is Not the MVP and Everybody Knows Damn Well Who Is!

Monday, May 7th, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

LBJ

I have already fortified myself for the haters that will come from this column.

So bring it!

It is true that in March, I said that I would vote for James Harden to be NBA MVP. At the time, the Rockets were on a 15-game winning-streak and had the best record in basketball, with Harden as their undisputed best player. The Cavs had just reconstituted half its roster less than a month earlier. I assumed that would eliminate “HIM” from any consideration to challenge Harden for the honor.

What changed my mind?

Have you been watching these NBA playoffs? Did you pay attention to the last month of the season? If the answer to either question is yes, you should not even need to ask that question.

This isn’t about what Harden hasn’t done. He averaged about 30 points and 8 assist during the regular season and has maintained that level of play during the playoffs. This is no small feat. It’s about what “HE” has done. During the regular season, “HE” averaged 27 points, 9 rebounds, and 8 assists. “HE” has maintained the assists, raised the rebounds from 9 to 10, and points from 27 to about 34. Add two game-winners for good measure and to think we are not even in the conference finals yet.

How about the supporting cast for each? I’ll concede that without Harden in the deep Western Conference, where 46 wins were not enough to get Denver into the playoffs, the Rockets would have struggled to make the playoffs. Without “HIM”, not only do the Cavs miss the playoffs, but it’s a lottery team.

Let’s preempt the most common darts used by “HIS” haters:

1) Michael Jordan never lost in the NBA finals: That is actually a team analysis. Jordan did not win any NBA title by himself any more than “HE” has lost any by himself. Jordan’s teams never won without Scottie Pippen. “HIS” teams have won without Dwyane Wade;

2) To be a 6’8 260 lbs. former all-state football player from talent rich Ohio, he whines too much for calls: I completely agree. That annoys me as well;

3) The “take my talents to South Beach” forever branded him as an unrepentant narcissist: maybe so but you must admit, it was marketing brilliance;

4) MVP is not supposed to consider the post season: technically true, but you cannot have it both ways. For years the shortcoming was “HIS” failure to win a title. That is postseason. Now that one can no longer cite this, it’s something else?

5) “HE” ain’t going to beat the Warriors: I don’t believe “HIS” team will either. But if beating a team with 4 all-stars and 3 recent MVPs is the bar to stop the hate, you are embarrassingly grasping for straws.

Last year while trying to make his case for MVP, Harden argued that playing all 82 games should count for something. He was right and as if to respond to Harden, after 15 years in the league, “HE” played all 82 games this year. Harden played 72. There clearly is no comparison between the two as defenders. If “HE” finds a way to carry this subpar Cavs roster to the NBA Finals, it would be “HIS” 8th straight appearance. You have to go back to the great Bill Russell Celtics of the 1960s for the last time any player has done this. It will compare to what Iverson was able to do with the 2001 Sixers……but at least he had the same roster for the entire year.

Surely by now you have noticed that I haven’t mentioned “HIS” name. There are two reasons for that, 1) to throw a bone to the haters who are losing their minds, not only because I say “HE” is MVP this year again, but the blasphemy of affirming that “HE” is not only worthy of the MJ comparison, but has a case for being better; and 2) you need not speak the name of royalty. Everybody knows who is “KING”!

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

The Crap Shoot Called the NFL Draft

Tuesday, May 1st, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

2011 NFL Draft

That annual rite of sports passage is mercifully over.

I am referring to the National Football League draft, which is quite possibly the single most over-analyzed, unscientific spectacle in American society.
Without even going into the aspect that has an undeniable slave auction feel and optics, can you think of any other event in America that has produced more self-appointed experts with less reliable outcomes than the NFL draft?

It’s not that the Mel Kipers of the world don’t do their homework. Most of them do. It’s not that the information provided is useless. Some of it is valuable.

The reason why the draft is largely a crap shoot is because no matter how sound the information gathered about a player, it is impossible to predict, with any degree of certainty how a 21-22 year old man will react to the NFL cultural environment. It’s bigger than just the football itself. First round picks become instant millionaires. In college, none have an abundance of expendable cash. In college, he must study subject matter he may not care about for the sake of staying eligible. In college, he did not have a multitude of parasitic people around him, some of whom are his own family. He will have that in addition to opportunistic women in the NFL. Lottery winners twice their age do not have a good track record of handling such a situation and we actually believe that we can forecast how a 20-something who has not even reached full brain maturity will?

Human behavior and performance is actually relatively predictable based on past behavior and performance. The wildcard caveat to such forecasts is that one must be able to replicate the environment and circumstances under which that past behavior and performance occurred. The best college football programs cannot replicate the NFL culture for their players.

This is why so few teams have a long track record of quality drafting. As a matter of fact, only one team comes to mind that has mastered this process over multiple generations and it is not the New England Patriots. The Patriots’ success is almost exclusively a function of the Tom Brady/ Bill Belichick era and let’s be honest, they got lucky with Brady. How else can you describe it when they waited until the 6th round to pick him? Do you really believe they would have waited that long had they had any inkling he would be what he has been? The other side draft benefit to having this sustained greatness for nearly 20 years at OB is that they have not had to take a QB in the first round. First round QBs are the most expensive picks and therefore the Patriots have had more cap space to pursue other players.

Call it “homerism” if you’d like, but the team that has had the most sustained draft success since the 1970 merger has been my own PITTSBURGH STEELERS!

That year was the last time the Steelers had the overall number 1 pick, which the team used on Terry Bradshaw. He is now in the Hall of Fame! Since then:

  • The Steelers have been the only team that has won at least 5 games every year. The Cowboys have hit rock bottom (4-28 in 1988-89). The 49ers have hit rock bottom (4-28 in 1978-79) and recently. The Patriots hit rock bottom on multiple occasions (9-39 from 1990-92 and 2-14 in 1981) prior to their current run. The Steelers have never hit rock bottom;
    • Four of their first 5 picks in 1974 (Swann, Lambert, Stallworth and Webster) are all in the Hall of Fame. Safety Donnie Shell was a free agent from that same class, signed out of HBCU South Carolina State and went on to become a perennial Pro-Bowler and may have his Hall of Fame name called soon;
    • The entire 1979 Super Bowl Champions roster were made up completely of their own draft picks. That had not happened before or since; and
    • The Steelers have won the most post season games (36), games overall, and of course Super Bowls (6) since the merger in 1970.

The term we card-carrying members of Steeler Nation use to describe our draft acumen is “STEEL CERTAIN!” And still yet, even with our great history and success, in 1983 we took Gabe Rivera out of Texas Tech instead of homegrown Dan Marino. It took the organization about 10 years to become a consistent playoff team again and about 20 before Big Ben’s arrival put us back on the top. No team is above blowing it in the draft.

So the next time you find yourself watching the draft “analysts” pontificating about the grades of each team’s draft before any of the picks have put on the team pads and uniform, take it with a grain of salt. Enjoy it for the entertainment it may be and nothing else.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

 

Charlie Brown, Lucy, and the Washington Sports Fan

Thursday, April 12th, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

CB

Those of or around my generation remember Charlie Brown attempting to kick the football held by that female joker Lucy. What was fascinating is not that Lucy pulled the ball away to get Charlie Brown once. Anybody can be had once. However, ole Chuck kept falling for Lucy’s okie-doke over and over again. It was suckerism on steroids.

I hate to say it, well actually, I do not, but the Washington sports fan reminds me of Charlie Brown.

When you think about it, it is incredible. How can anyone run the same game on his/her victims repeatedly and have them fall for it repeatedly? It is not as if the game has been cleaned up or got a makeover. It is as if Bernie Madoff were released from prison tomorrow and a significant number of his victims would buy into yet another of his Ponzi schemes.

Every year across the four different major sports, the fans of this area are every bit as optimistic as Charlie Brown charging to kick that damn football. The fact that history does not dissuade them from accepting their inevitable fate is either delusional or optimistic on the level of spiritual faith……some will argue that their little difference between the two.

This isn’t just hyperbole. When the Cleveland Cavaliers won its first NBA title in 2016 and the first of any kind for the city since the 1964 Browns, that left Washington, DC and St. Paul/Minneapolis in the lead for title droughts among cities with at least three major sports teams. Not since 1991 has either city/metropolis won a title.

It is not just that they have not been able to win a title in nearly 30 years, but how they have lost. Each sports team has managed to tease its fans just enough to make them dare to believe, only to give up the ghost in the end. Personally, if my teams are not going to be good, put me out of my misery early. Giants let me know by May, Lakers let me know by December, etc., etc.

The biggest culprit among Washington sports teams is clearly the Capitals. They have blown five 3-1 post-season leads to lose game seven, twice to their nemesis, the Pittsburgh Penguins. I cannot think of any franchise in any of the four sports that has the number of another franchise the way the Pens own the Caps. Of their ten playoff encounters, Washington has only beaten Pittsburgh once.

The Penguins may as well be Lucy.

Then there is the Washington Nationals, who have yet to win a playoff series. They have been eliminated at home three times. I was at the 2012 collapse against the Cardinals and it was by far the most depressing sports atmosphere of which I had ever been a part. I was there in 2014 when my Giants rolled in for two games and rolled out with two wins. In 2016, it was the Dodgers, and last year it was the Cubs.

The Cardinals, Giants, Dodgers, and Cubs may as well be Lucy.

Then there is the Wizards who are good for winning road games against superior teams only to come back home and lose when they have a chance to get a strangle hold on a series. The last time the Washington Wizards franchise won at least 50 games was 1979, when they were the Bullets and defending NBA champions.

Finally, there is the football team. I contend that just maybe its racist name might be the curse over all of the city’s sports teams. Until they change it, I have no sympathy for them.

It is a shame because Washington has one of the truly great fanbases in America.

However, as the late native Washingtonian great Marvin Gaye would sing, there are “four” things in life for sure: taxes, death, trouble, and Washington sports fans believing that this year Lucy will not pull the damn football away.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

How Baseball Became a Litmus Test for Blackness and Why I Don’t Give a Damn

Tuesday, April 3rd, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

BB

Baseball is back and along with it the same annual rituals: the Spring and warmer weather is approaching, my Giants spanking the Dodgers, and other Black folks giving me the side-eye of suspicion for so openly loving the game.

 

Yep! It is not an uncommon line of thinking among some Black folks that baseball is a white game. This thinking is not totally without merit but it was not always this way. As hard as this may be to believe for the younger generations, there was indeed a time when baseball was the unquestioned most popular sport among Black America. Its representation at the Major League level peaked in the mid-70s to early 80s at about 25%.

 

And then things began to change. I cite two primary reasons: 1) deindustrialization of the economy and the criminal industrial complex, both of which disproportionately adversely affected Black men, who would have been the primary teachers and passers of the game of baseball. Subsequent reasons are the rise of the Latin American player to fill the void and AAU basketball, which all but requires year-round participation. The cumulative result of all these factors is that today that 25% from the mid-70s-early 80s is now about 7% and declining.

 

With this change in the face of baseball came the stigma for Black youth who aspired to play the game in the form of the accusation of “acting white”. Peer acceptance among youth is important across cultural and demographic lines. That importance is even greater among oppressed and already isolated peoples. The value of community endorsement is not easily set aside.

 

One of the many struggles of oppressed and segregated groups is to resist oppressed and segregated thinking. This is outlined beautifully in the late Brazilian Educator Paolo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed. The less we see our reflection in baseball or any other activity or venue, the more the thinking creeps in that this just isn’t for us. The natural companion of that thinking is that any Black person who aspires to or likes the activity is running from his community identification. For Black folks the need to dismantle a criminal justice system, rooted in Capitalism and White supremacy that literally kills us with little to no accountability for doing so, is an overwhelming challenge and discouraging for some. It is much easier to question the cultural identity of someone who likes baseball than to deal with the substantive sources of our oppression.

 

This is not to suggest that there aren’t Black folks who do both consciously and subconsciously seek out interest for the specific purpose of separating themselves from the lager group.

 

I’m just not the one.

 

There is hope and high profile Black baseball fans exempt from this litmus test. One who comes to mind is local cultural icon and poet Ethelbert Miller. Besides finding a way to never age, for some 40 years he worked at my alma mater, Howard University, as head of its Moorland Spingarn Research Center. It is one of the world’s greatest repositories of Black history, culture, and life. I met him upon my arrival at Howard in 1991. He also just released his second book on baseball called “If God Invented Baseball?”. Yes, I will be reading it soon.

 

But with or without high profile Black baseball fans, I always have and always will love baseball. For any cultural legitimacy gatekeepers who have a problem with that, I strongly suggest you find a more useful way to spend your time and hate. I don’t care what you think!

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

Do Not Let the Madness March Over HBCU Basketball

Thursday, March 15th, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

Brackets

 

March Madness is here and we college basketball fans are excited.

The National Collegiate Athletic Association’s (NCAA) annual ritual is the single most entertaining sports event in the world for me.

It is also a cash cow. The NCAA will get $857 million from Turner this year. Within a few years, it will be generating over $1 Billion in TV revenue alone.

I am also a proud Historically Black College and University (HBCU) graduate of Howard University!

As March Madness grows to include more teams, it is crucial that we fight against efforts that would exclude HBCU’s. The most specific threat against HBCU’s is the call to eliminate the automatic bid system.

The current system allows any Division 1 team that wins its conference championship to secure an automatic bid to the tournament.

This is how you sometimes end up with teams with say a 15-15 record in the tournament. ESPN commentator Jay Bilas, whose opinion I generally respect, would do away with this. His contention is that the best 68 teams should be selected via record, who you played, and where you played them, as well as the infamous “eye test”. In a vacuum, it is a compelling case. Who among us that are sports fans don’t want the best teams in the playoffs?

The problem is that nothing in this world is ever in a vacuum. There is both a historical and current day context for all understanding and college basketball is no different.

The history is that up until 1957, HBCU’s were not permitted to participate at all due to the Jim Crow laws of that day. The National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics (NAIA) was actually the first to admit such schools. The NCAA was forced to admit schools in order to compete.  There was a time when only conference champions made the tournament. This is why arguably the greatest team in the history of Maryland basketball did not get to play in the tournament. The 1973-74 team that featured John Lucas, Tom McMillan, and Len Elmore finished 23-5. All of their losses were to North Carolina, 8-time defending champion UCLA, and eventual national champion North Carolina State, that beat Maryland in the Atlantic Coast Conference tournament. Some say that game was the greatest college basketball game ever played.  There were calls to eliminate the automatic bid at that time but the alternative of awarding at-large bids won out and was implemented in 1980. This was a boon for the power conference schools, while keeping the automatic bid process.

The tournament has expanded over the years largely due to its incredible popularity. However, with every expansion comes the call to eliminate the automatic bid process.

Doing so would be a deathblow for HBCU basketball.

Contrary to what the current Secretary of Education thinks, HBCU’s were not born out of choice but out of a necessary response to racism. That same factor has always undermined these institutions’ financial struggles. Participation in this tournament not only gives them a rightful cut of the eventual $1 billion TV pie, but also helps with recruitment of both athletes and non-student athletes.

You may think if they want to participate, they should have to earn it like every other school. How did that work out for Central Florida in college football? They went undefeated, concluding by whipping Auburn from the mighty SEC, which beat both title game finalists. Yet they were systemically locked out of any chance to win the college football title. There was nothing that they could do differently because the power schools do not have to play them. The same would and already does happen to HBCU’s. The best they get is a “pay to play” trip across the country to play larger programs for a check. Only in the tournament do they get to compete in a neutral site.

It is not as if HBCU’s have no history of success.  Of the eight number 15 seeds to win a game, three were from the Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference (MEAC, the home of my Howard University).

We are talking about a basketball legacy that has produced Willis Reed, Earl Monroe, and Sam Jones. Such talent now rarely considers HBCU’s in basketball, which is a byproduct of the raid that integration brought about. Simply put, the struggles of HBCU basketball are not from bad coaching or management, but they are a direct result of the expansion of opportunities for the players. The automatic bid process is the only safeguard that keeps HBCU’s at the table. The system is rigged to favor the power schools and without the automatic bid, HBCU’s will be shut out.

It should remain and we should fight any argument otherwise.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports