Posts Tagged ‘Gus Griffin’

The Trouble with Dak Prescott

Friday, August 10th, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

DP3

When Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones doubled down on his total disregard for player protest and specifically Black Lives in general, he was simply being who he is; a “good ole boy” who takes a great deal of pride in his role as a modern-day plantation overseer. Jones declared that anyone that does not come out for the anthem and stand will be cut. I hardly think that anyone was surprised.

The team’s African American QB from Louisiana and Mississippi, Dak Prescott, essentially agreed with his owner. The phrase many of us Black folks use to describe his behavior would be “cooning”. For those who don’t know, it is a phrase Black people use to describe other Black folks who are obsessed with staying in the good graces of whites.

This is the most troubling quote:

“I never protest during the anthem. I don’t think that is the time or venue to do that.”

Are you f$%%#@%* serious?

Is that all you got?

It’s a good thing that one cannot be sued for plagiarizing the thoughts of others because Dak would be in big legal trouble if it were possible. He may as well have said to Jerry Jones, “You tell em massa”.

DP2

The issue is not that he refuses to kneel during the anthem. I actually believe that form of protest has about exhausted its effectiveness. I have 4 basic issues with the position:

  • Zero creativity: This is a classic case of someone simply repeating a narrative that they heard someone else say, without any critical independent thought of his own. If you are going to shovel BS, at least make sure it has a unique aroma;
  • Pitifully elusive: Whenever someone says it’s not the right time or place for resistance to injustice, you can be sure that for that person, there is NEVER a right time or place;
  • Stockholm Syndrome: is a condition that causes hostages to develop a psychological alliance with their captors, as a survival strategy during captivity. Dak’s position clearly sides with his oppressor….I mean boss.
  • Illusion of separation: one gets the impression from this comment that Dak thinks he is above that which has stung Black America. It’s as if he feels his status would have saved him from the terrorist that went into a Black church in South Carolina and shot nine people to death simply because of the color of their skin.

I could go on and on about how problematic his position is on so many levels, but at the core is simply that the statement is not true. If it were, that would be tantamount to saying that all those prior, who used the athletic venue as a platform to advance the struggle for social justice to include Muhammed Ali, John Carlos, Tommie Smith, Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf, and yes, Colin Kaepernick, were all wrong. If that were true, there is no way that Dak would be the quarterback of the Dallas Cowboys.

The most hopeful thing to do is just assume that Dak is young and not fully conscious of how treasoness his position is to those whose lives are at risk every day.  After all, even the great Jackie DPRobinson stained his reputation with public criticisms of both Paul Robeson and Ali. To his credit, before he died, he came to realize the error of his ways and by the late 1960’s was supportive of the many student-athlete protests around the country. Maybe Dak will develop in a similar way and let’s hope it’s sooner than later. Right now, he is clearly in a “sunken place”.

This weekend, White Supremacist will be descending on Washington, DC on the anniversary of them literally killing Heather Heyer. She was the social justice activist killed when she joined many others to confront the Nazis at the University of Virginia. She was not a celebrity or of great wealth. She, nevertheless, chose to risk her life and ultimately gave her life to stand up for what is right. Oh, and Heather Heyer was White. That is relevant because she could have chosen the path of many whites and simply ignore the reality of racism, since it does not have the immediate impact on her that it does on Black people. For that reason alone, she should always be remembered and revered.

Dak Prescott, on the other hand, does have celebrity and wealth. Oh, and he is Black…..whether he knows it or not. If Heyer saw the need to take a stand, what possible excuse could he have?

It is for these reasons, with this backdrop why Prescott’s pitiful declaration of where the struggle should not take place is so shameful.

Dak Prescott is the quarterback for the Dallas Cowboys, “America’s Team”. With that title comes the capacity to represent what America has been and is, or what America should be and can be. The choice is his but no choice is not an option. It’s the price of the party.

Just as frustrating about Prescott’s failure to take a stand is the fact that he is one of two players that could cross Jerry Jones’ line in the sand and not be cut (the other being Ezekiel Elliot). As much as Jones detests non-compliance, he loves to win even more. There is no way that he would cut either. There is precedence. Before the 1993 season, Hall of Fame running back Emmitt Smith held out fresh off the Cowboys winning the Super Bowl. Jones refused to budge……..until the Cowboys started the season 0-2. Emmitt was back for the 3rd game and the Boys would go on to repeat and win again after the 1995 season. If the “stars” take a stand, Jerry will stand down.

It’s fourth and goal in the red zone of America, Mr. Prescott. You do not get to sit this play out.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

Why Sports and Loyalty Don’t Mix

Monday, July 30th, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

DD

What do Babe Ruth, Willie Mays, Johnny Unitas, Joe Montana, Jerry Rice, and Patrick Ewing all have in common? They were first ballot Hall of Famers who were kicked to the curb by their signature teams once they felt that they could do better without them. What I have never quite understood is why fans are so much more critical of the player who rejects loyalty while giving teams a pass for the same behavior?

While I do not contend either DeMar DeRozan or Kawhi Leonard are on the level of the players previously mentioned, I was reminded of such players this past week when the two were traded for one another. Especially noteworthy was DeRozen’s shock and dumbfounded reaction.

DeRozan seemed to feel that since he has indeed been among the 3-4 best shooting guards in the NBA over the past 10 years, it would account for something. He thought that because he had embraced the Toronto community and life, like no other Raptor before him, to include the significant additional tax burden, that he was above his current fate. DeRozan evidently thought that because management did not imply in any way that he was indeed expendable, which he wasn’t. He thought because he never considered leaving via free agency a few years ago that his demonstrated loyalty to the team would be reciprocated.

There is a phrase that best summarizes the only response to DeRozan’s disappointment:

“Wake up and smell the coffee.”

DeRozan made one fatal flaw that is not uncommon for loyalists; he thought that the loyalty he extended would have been reciprocated.  He was wrong.

I am not making light of how he feels nor the impact of an involuntary move on an NBA player and his family…even a multimillionaire. It is no small or simple thing to have to uproot one’s family and literally move them to another country. The children must change schools, etc. I even agree with DeRozan that at the very least the “humane” thing for the Raptors to do would have been to alert him that they would consider moving him.

But professional sports is often not humane. It is the descendent of the gladiator world of ancient Rome, and when you cannot entertain the fans or provide the labor your team wants, you will be discarded as easily as a piece of meat for the hungry lions.

This callousness is by no means limited to sports. Look at the raid on public employee pension plans. Or the austerity approach to public debt while simultaneously giving tax breaks to the rich (of which admittedly DeRozan is a part of). Or dare I say, the reneging on contractually agreed upon raises for community college professors. Time and time again, those who ultimately control the capital have demonstrated that their use for those of us who are labor only extends to the degree that they can profit from our labor. There is nothing loyal or humane about this.

Now more than a few fans will dismiss DeRozan’s lament on the exclusive basis of “he makes a lot of money”. To those I refer you the late-great baseball all-star and free agency trailblazer Curt Flood. In 1969, AFTER his contract with the Cardinals had expired, they traded him to the Philadelphia Phillies. Up until this point, baseball and all other sports could do this under something referred to as the “Reserve Clause”, which essentially determined that a player’s rights, even if no longer under contract belong to a team until that team decided to either cut the player or trade him. The only problem was that Flood refused the trade under the notion that he was not a piece of chattel or property. When he alluded to chattel, that outraged many in that he seemed to be comparing himself to a slave. When asked by the iconic Howard Cosell about the appropriateness of the analogy given that he was paid a salary of over $100,000 at that time, Flood responded “a well-paid slave is a slave nonetheless”.

What happened to DeRozan is but more proof that there is neither loyalty in sports nor the larger American society. Furthermore, it is a prime example why I NEVER dispute a player’s attempt to get every dime he can from owners in the short run. In the long run, we must decide what kind of society we want, both inside and outside sports. Do we want one with no sense of reciprocal obligations to humanity? Or one that validates “dog eat dog” parasitic behavior under the notion of “it’s just business”?

Clearly DeRozan was under the wrong impression which of these two societies he currently resides.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

Home Runs, Credit, and Sex

Thursday, July 19th, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

HR

As I watched this week’s MLB Home Run Derby and All-Star game, I could not help but marvel at the evolution of the home run.

However, I am not sure if that evolution is for the better of the game.

There is no question that home runs are up, even in the so-called “Post-Steroid Era”.  Consider that the per game rate in 2014 was .86. That rose to 1.01 in 2015, 1.16 in 2016, and 1.26 in 20017. This was topped off by both single-season and World Series all-time records for homers in 2017, and then this week, a record for All-Star Game home runs.

Even scientists hired by MLB to explain the home run surge could not, other than citing less wind resistance. They stopped short of saying global warming and so will I.

Why does the increase in home runs concern me? Because when one of the game’s most exciting aspects loses its rarity, so too does it lose some of its value. If there were a Big Foot citing every few hours, no one would give a damn. The rarity of it is a part of its value.

This brings us to credit.

I am a child of the 60’s and fiscally conservative parents…by necessity. They were working-class and had mouths to feed, and thus frivolous spending was not an option.  Going through our father’s records upon his death in 1991, I remember coming across a credit card statement with a limit of $5000.

He owed a grand total of about $400.

He was of a generation that generally used credit for big-ticket items and unexpected needs. Vacations did not qualify.

Somewhere along the line, predatory creditors learned that there was profit in exploiting the desire of working class and middle class Americans to indulge their Walter Mitty aspirations to live beyond their means. As a result, credit was made a lot easier to attain and the outcome was the near financial collapse of about 10 years ago.

This brings us to the only reason some of you are reading this column: SEX!

Back in the day, you had to date a girl 3 times just to get a kiss. Not anymore and as a result, appreciation for one of life and nature’s greatest activities has dropped to an all-time low. Ok, I have absolutely no research to support this assertion….but I know it to be true and so do you. As that great philosopher Dave Chappelle once said,
“If p…… was a stock, that shit would be plummeting right now, because you flooded the market with it. You give it away too easy.”

We could add the 3-point shot in basketball and two-minute touchdown drives in football in this same category.  What do they all have in common: they are examples that it is human nature to take for granted that which comes easily and in the process, it is devalued.

Therefore, I say that we would appreciate baseball more if there were fewer home runs.

We would have less debt if credit were not so easy to get.

We would have a greater appreciation for sex, if we had it in less quantity.

Well, maybe I got a little carried away with that last one. Appreciation can be overrated! Ha!

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

10 Reasons Why LeBron and the Lakers Make Sense

Tuesday, July 10th, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

PE

Now that the “wow” and dust has settled, let’s look at last week’s biggest sports story: my Lakers’ signing of LeBron James.

There are legitimate basketball-based reasons for the Lakers to have not signed “The King”, such as, why hamstring your roster and salary cap with any one player when he won’t be enough to win the title?; or 2) Why increase the temptation to give up young, promising talent for another piece, such as Kawhi Leonard, when even if at his best, still likely will not be enough to beat the “Beast by the Bay?”; or 3) Previous Laker teams that acquired superstars were better than this group and thus the acquisition got them closer to a title.

Those, among others, are perfectly rational reasons.

But I have been a card-carrying member of Laker Nation since 1972 and rational thinking has no place in this column.

So, I give you the 10 reasons why LeBron and the Lakers make sense:

REASON 10: “The Apostle.” Pau Gasol

Does anyone believe my Lakers make it to 3 straight Finals from 2008-10 and win two titles without the acquisition of Gasol from Memphis? While he is not in the class of the next three I’ll name, he may be the most underappreciated Laker of any of the title teams.

REASON 9: Wilt Chamberlain

Getting Chamberlain before the 1969 season kept an aging team (Both West and Baylor were 10 years into the league) as a powerhouse without a rebuilding period. My Lakers made the Finals in 69, 70, 72, and 73, winning it all in 1972 with what was then a single-season record of 69-13, that also included a 33-game winning streak over the 71 and 72 seasons.

REASON 8: “Shaq”

He was acquired via free agency from the Magic. Once Kobe matured, Shaq led my Lakers to the NBA’s last 3-peat, 2000-02. He was Finals MVP all three times.

REASON 7: Kareem the Supreme

Already a proven winner, leading the Bucks to the 1971 title and reaching the Finals again in 1974, the case can be made that Jabbar’s acquisition was the most beneficial of any superstar in integrated sports history.  He was the leading scorer on 3 of the 5 title teams of the 80s.

REASON 6: Putting down the Daddyball factor

I, for one, never understood why so many overreacted to LaVar Ball’s fine-line walk between buffoonery and marketing brilliance. Regardless, LeBron’s presence alone will push this issue to where it always belonged, which is the back page of the tabloid section. The other benefit is that it takes any undue pressure off Lonzo and allows him to develop with less of the scrutiny of those who wanted him to fail, to clam up pop.

REASON 5: Attractive to free agents again

Other than Kyrie Irving, who has had a big problem playing with LeBron, this move makes the Lakers an attractive destination for free agents again….maybe even for a discount.

REASON 4: Reclaiming L.A.

You know your team has sunk to an all-time low when folks would rather see the Clippers. Those days are over!

REASON 3: The Warriors can’t keep everyone

Klay Thompson comes up for free agency soon.  Boogie Cousins returning to form is far from a sure thing, given the history of Achilles injuries (I for one believe our own Black Mamba might still be playing were it not for this injury so late in his career).

REASON 2: The Herm Edwards factor

“YOU PLAY…TO WIN….THE GAME!”  How can getting the best player in the league via free agency undermine that goal? No, it does not put us on par with that Beast By the Bay. Some of you state this as if you are announcing a cure for cancer. But it does make you a better team.

And the number 1 reason LeBron and the Lakers make sense is…………….

…….drumroll……

WE ARE THE LOS ANGELES LAKERS AND YOU ARE NOT!

This would be highly questionable for any other franchise.

We are not any other franchise.

We are the mighty Los Angeles Lakers, draped in the majestic purple and gold, which is to say WE ARE SPORTS ROYALTY, and that is why we are suited for a King.  Feel fortunate that we even condescend to speak to mere mortal fans such as those of the Kings or Wizards. No other organization in sports history has proven to be better equipped to accommodate a superstar than the Lakers.

So ,Laker haters prepare to resume your hate because weather you like it or not, we matter once again!

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

The World Cup, Africa, and Why I Wish Serena Would Not Bow

Saturday, June 30th, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

Super-Eagles-Celebrate

Even as a casual soccer fan, it is hard for me to watch the World Cup, the most popular sporting event worldwide, without wondering what could be for African Nations. Despite African-born or heritage players on many teams, especially European teams, no nation from Africa has ever won the cup. Despite the events’ widely acknowledged greatest player in its History, Brazil’s Pele, being himself of African descent and forecasting that an African nation would win the cup by 2000, none have even made it to the semi-finals.

But why?

Some will cite a structural reason that is clearly biased toward Europe.  There are 54 countries in Africa and yet it is only allocated five slots in the World Cup tournament. Conversely, Europe has 50 countries and gets 13 slots.

Still, others will cite the same ole dog whistle analysis to explain why African countries have not succeeded to the level of its enormous talent and resources; bad governance, undisciplined players…blah, blah, blah. I do not contend that none of those are factors. I actually would agree that bad governance compounds the issue. I only argue that they are not at the root. At the root are the same factors responsible for the continent’s underdevelopment in general and that is the exploitation by foreign interests, especially Europe.

For a point of reference, look at how U.S. baseball pillages Latin American baseball talent…compound that worldwide and that is what you have with European countries and the African soccer players.

To be fair, European countries are not the only culprits. Qatar has recently indulged as well, under the guise of humanitarian motivations with its Aspire Academy, which recruits young African soccer players to their country in their effort to build a World Cup contender.

However, my primary focus is Europe, due to its wider history of exploiting Africa for both human and material resources, and the wealth it accumulated as a result.

SWThat brings us to Serena Williams and the pending Wimbledon Tennis tournament. She has won this tournament seven times, and each time before being crowned is “required” by tradition to do some curtsy to the Queen of England. It strikes me as bowing and I have always had a serious problem with that practice.

The Industrial Revolution would have been impossible without the wealth generated by slave labor. Britain’s major ports, cities, and canals were built on invested slave money. Several banks, to include Barclays, as well the Church of England built their wealth on the slave trade of African free labor. In other words, the ancestors of Serena Williams.

Indeed, as the great scholar Eric Williams illustrates clearly in “Capitalism and Slavery”, you cannot speak of one without speaking of the other.

Please save the tired apologist responses such as, “We cannot rewrite history”. Rewriting history is not the issue. Collecting on the debt is. We validate this right for the decedents and survivors of the Holocaust, as well we should. However, when it comes to African people, we adapt the “let bygones be bygones” approach. This mindset was on blatant display when the British offered to “lend” Nigerian art back to Nigeria…art it stole during the colonial era.

Let that sink in for a moment.

That is like a crackhead carjacking you and then offering to lend you your own car.

I know that Serena refusing to bow to the Queen of England will not address the massive debt owed to African people by England. I just want the issue raised in the consciousness of the world and she would have the platform to do just that.

My thinking on this issue was greatly influenced by a dear friend and mentor who passed away last Saturday. Macheo Shabaka introduced me to the concept of Pan Africanism, which insist that we of African descent, regardless of where we were born, are still Africans, and obliged to act on her and her people’s behalf. If we don’t, who will? Were he still alive, he would agree with me when I say that Serena Williams should not bow to the Queen of England. In fact, the Queen and all of England should bow to her and all of Africa and her peoples.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

What Do Allen Iverson and Voters Have in Common?

Thursday, June 21st, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

AI

The primary voting season is here. While many will think of the local State’s Attorney’s race or in DC, Proposition 77 – aimed at increasing the income of restaurant workers, what I think of in addition to those things is the NBA Hall of Famer and DMV icon Allen Iverson.

Stay with me.

Generously listed at 6 feet, not only was Iverson one of the most exciting basketball players of any era, but he was one of the best high school athletes the country has EVER seen.  In addition to being an 11-time NBA All-Star, 2-time All-Star game MVP, and the 2001 NBA MVP, Iverson was an all-state quarterback in the talent-rich Hampton Roads area of Virginia. Three days after leading his high school to the state title in football, he made his basketball debut for the year….scoring 47 points! He was the Associated Press High School Player of the Year in both football and basketball.

Under the inch-for-inch, pound-for-pound criteria, Iverson would be very high on the list of best all-around athletes of my lifetime.

In addition to that, Iverson was iconic among the Hip Hop culture, in no small part to his refusal to modify who he was, warts and all, in exchange for commercial endorsements. Simply put in the eyes of his fans, Iverson kept it real.

I have played softball with a person for several years whom I call, “the Question”. Why? Because I never knew if he would be where he is supposed to be.  Allen Iverson’s nickname was “THE ANSWER”, because on game day, regardless of injuries and being literally the smallest person on the court, you knew Iverson came to play and play with no fear. Even against the likes of Shaq, who was literally more than twice his size, Iverson would go to the hole without hesitation.

The only time you could not count on “an Answer” was during practice. He was so uninterested in it that his coach in Philadelphia, the great Larry Brown, finally called him out about the matter to the media. Iverson responded at a press conference with one of the most memorable sports quotes ever…

“We’re sitting in here, and I’m supposed to be the franchise player, and we in here talking about practice. I mean, listen, we’re talking about practice, not a game, not a game, not a game, we talking about practice. Not a game. Not, not … Not the game that I go out there and die for and play every game like it’s my last. Not the game, but we’re talking about practice, man. I mean, how silly is that? … And we talking about practice. I know I supposed to be there. I know I’m supposed to lead by example… I know that… And I’m not.. I’m not shoving it aside, you know, like it don’t mean anything. I know it’s important, I do. I honestly do… But we’re talking about practice man. What are we talking about? Practice? We’re talking about practice.”

Jim SmithThis is why Iverson reminds me of all too many voters. The less repeated part of the quote was the fact that he knew that he was wrong and acknowledged such. However, my feeling is that rarely before had anyone actually demanded more from him. He viewed games the way many voters view elections. In addition, both have the same fatal flaw and that is the failure to realize that the work before and in between the games and elections is how best to get results from the games and elections.

Though I played multiple sports growing up, I did not fully appreciate the significance of practice until I began to coach. Likewise, though I have voted all my adult life, the more politically conscious I become, the more I realize that the critical work is ongoing before, in between, and after elections. It’s constant political education, holding both police and elected officials accountable, be they Barack Obama or the current president, and even non-electoral organizing work.

So I say to you voters as I would say to Iverson; we are not just talking about practice. We are not just talking about elections. We are talking about putting in that grind and the hard, thankless work when no one is watching. Had we been as engaged out of election season as we are during the election season, maybe we could have prevented the conditions that allowed for the election of the current President of the United States. Just as it was always about more than practice, it has always been about more than voting.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

The Long and Enduring Climb of the Washington Capitals

Wednesday, June 13th, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

WC

About a month ago, several of you may recall a column I penned called “Charlie Brown, Lucy, and Washington Sports Fans”, in which I analogized DC area sports fans as hopelessly doomed for disappointment as the Peanuts character in his never-ending attempts to kick the football held by Lucy. While all four of the major sports teams have contributed to the agony of long-suffering DC fans, without question, the Washington Capitals were the biggest culprits. So perhaps it is fitting that for the first time since 1992, the team that had teased Washington sports fans the most, finally rewarded them when the Caps won their first Stanley Cup Championship in franchise history.

Charlie Brown finally kicked the damn ball!

Moreover, they did it in true Caps style…..giving their fans a heart attack in the process. They were down in every series, forced to slay the longtime nemesis Pittsburgh Penguins, had key players suspended, loss 3 straight games to Tampa, and still somehow clinched every series on the road, including a game 7. In other words, in every area that this franchise had historically failed so often to the point that its fans could anticipate the doom, this team passed with excellence. The Caps’ 10 road wins ties four other teams for the most in a single postseason.

However, you must be around hardcore Caps fans to really appreciate what it meant. This is from just such a fan:

“I have rooted for the Caps since the 1993-94 season. They lost in the second round of the playoffs that year to the New York Rangers. It was upsetting at the time, but I had no idea how many years of frustration it would be after that. There certainly have been a lot of players since then….The 1998 Stanley Cup Final run brought out the best in Olie Kolzig, Adam Oates, Joe Juneau, and my favorite, Peter Bondra….There was the failed Jaromir Jagr experiment and the many promising but ultimately faltering goalies….For a long time it seemed like the Ovechkin era would go the same way. The core players were great, but after many years of failure it seemed like they, too, were destined to be a great regular season team with no chance of winning it all. I had resigned myself to waiting another 15-20 years, long after the Ovechkin era was over, before the Caps would have any chance of making another run.

And then this year’s playoffs began.

At first, it was more of the same, losing two to the Columbus Blue Jackets (at home). But then something clicked in Game 3 and they never looked back. Anytime they had their backs against the wall, someone new stepped up. If it wasn’t Ovechkin, it was Backstrom, Carlsson, Oshie, or Holtby. Or it was an unexpected source, like Eller, Smith-Pelley, or Beagle. Hell, even Brooks Orpik played well when we needed him! I didn’t want to hope, but I knew something was different about this team than any Caps team I have ever seen. They had grit, resiliency, and patience on top of talent, and the result was different from any Caps team I’ve ever seen. A lot has happened in since 1993-94, good and bad. The world is a much different place then when I was 14, watching my first hockey playoffs. But after all of the heartache and frustration, after all of the times having my hopes raised and then dashed, I am finally able to say, after 25 years of pulling for them, that the Washington Capitals are Stanley Cup Champions. Cheers.” – Tom Goldstein

None of this is to suggest that sports will bring about world peace, justice for oppressed people, or a cure for cancer. It most certainly will not. However, what it can do is provide hope for the human spirit and as a well-read book says, “A man without hope is most miserable.”

So add the Caps to a list that includes Caroline Wozniaki and Simona Halep for winning their first major tennis titles and the Philadelphia Eagles for winning its first Super Bowl this year. All are symbols that no matter how many let downs or how much frustration, if we keep getting up and we are willing to struggle, someday we can be champions and win a better world.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

Who Has the Most to Lose in the NBA Finals?

Thursday, May 31st, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

Photo courtesy of USA Today

Photo courtesy of USA Today

It is hard to find storylines for an NBA finals matchup in its fourth consecutive edition. With that said, I think the discussion about whom has the most on the line or to lose is worthy.

Many will say LeBron James has the most on the line. This makes sense for those obsessed with the comparison to Michael Jordan. I am not among those. It is not that I do not believe it is a valid discussion, even if I am not quite ready to put him over Michael Jordan. My issue is that it is largely a disingenuous straw man debate used as a platform for those who just do not like LeBron. I say this because their bar for even considering him with Jordan is seven NBA titles…….or 4 more for teams LeBron is on….which they know will not happen. They then follow up with “if we should credit him for taking a bad team a long way, we should be able to criticize him for losing in the NBA finals 5 times”. That is like crediting a weight-lifter for bench-pressing 400 lbs., but then knocking him for not being able to lift 500 lbs.

The basic reason that LeBron does not have the most on the line or to lose is because it is really beyond reason to expect him to play significantly better than he already has. That will not matter one bit to a certain faction of fans out there. For them, even if LeBron James walked on water, they would complain that his feet got wet. Nothing he nor his team does will change their minds. Donald Trump will welcome immigrants before they cede him his proper due, even if that is short of Jordan. Simply put, if the Gospel of King James has not converted them by now, without adding asterisks or “if” caveats, it never will. We should let them go and cease trying to have reasonable discussions with them.

This brings us to the place of the Golden State Warriors among the all-time greatest teams. Because of this quest, the Warriors have the most to lose. Think about it this way: the Warriors have four all-stars. Does anyone believe that Klay Thompson and Draymond Green are going to take less money to stay? Draymond’s skill set would require two to three players to replace. Thompson has a case for being their best big-game postseason guard. It is not that they have not already accomplished great things. Winning two titles in 3 years is indeed great and yes, but for a suspension, there is a good chance they would be looking at a 4th straight this year.

If “ifs” and “buts” were candy and nuts, we would all have a merry day.

We do not assign all-time great team designations based on endless selective “if” hypotheticals. If Paul does not get hurt, are the Warriors even in this final? You are what your record says you are and that can be completely assigned to teams as opposed to one player.

The fact is the Warriors’ window for joining the likes of the Celtics of the 60s, Lakers of the 80s and Shaq/Kobe era, Pistons of Isiah, and of course, the Bulls with Jordan, is likely closing. What do all those teams have in common? They all repeated as champions. Though I expect the Warriors to accomplish that feat within a week or two, it should not be taken for granted. Those of us that remember the 1983 76ers, who had just acquired the great Moses Malone to join Julius Erving, and then loss only 1 playoff game on the way to sweeping my Lakers for the title, expected that to be the first of several.

It was the last of one.

The same was the case for the 1985 Bears and the 1986 Mets. I would include the 1985 Hoyas of Georgetown, but at least it took a perfect game from Villanova (they shot about 75% for the game and still could only win by 2) to deny them their place. Far less have derailed many teams aspiring to all-time greatness status.

Therefore, that is what is on the line for the Warriors….all time greatness. LeBron will be viewed as LeBron will be viewed.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

How to Bring NFL Owners to Their Knees

Saturday, May 26th, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

Image courtesy of USAToday.com

Image courtesy of USAToday.com

How is that protesting the NFL working for you?

If the unilateral policy change handed down by NFL owners, which banned the kneeling sparked by Colin Kaepernick during the National Anthem is any indication, it is not working too well.

Then and again, the protesting tactic of not watching or going to games never had much of a chance to have the impact those who advanced it sought.  Why? Because the demographics of those most directly impacted by the police brutality that Kaepernick and others were protesting simply do not make up enough of the season ticket holders and television viewing audience to have made a dent in NFL profits. About 77% of NFL fans are Caucasian, compared to 15% being African-American/Black, and 8% being Hispanic. Maybe immigrants and others most adversely affected by police brutality may make up another 2%, which puts the number at 25%.

While 1 out of 4 is not insignificant, it will not make a difference because the appetite for the NFL, even with declining TV ratings, still far outpaces that of its competitors. Think of it like the difference between the wholesale and retail price. The mark up is so high that when they claim to be having a sale, the consumer is duped into thinking he or she got a bargain, when in fact the seller had plenty of room to drop the price and still walk away way ahead. Does anyone really believe that networks are going to drop out of the business of broadcasting NFL games? Does anyone believe that advertisers will decide to try to reach customers through bowling rather than football?

As for season ticket holders, let us say all those from the most affected groups decide today to give up their tickets. Have you seen the waiting list for season tickets in places like New England, Dallas, Washington, Pittsburgh, Green Bay, and New York? They would be replaced without a blink of an eye. Moreover, the NFL has moved in the same direction as the larger society, which accommodates the privileged through corporate suites etc. at the expense of the dwindling working and middle-class customers, who have not been already priced out of season tickets. Simply put, as long as the money keeps rolling in, NFL owners could not care less what those affected by police brutality think or feel, and they certainly do not care about the freedom of speech rights of its labor. It really was no surprise that the owners did not even bother to consult the NFL Players Association about the policy change. They have been emboldened by the recent Supreme Court ruling against labor that allows class-action waivers in favor of arbitration agreements to be a condition of employment. There is no reason to believe the right-leaning court will not rule against labor again in the upcoming “Janus” case, which seeks to literally bust unions.

Image courtesy of the NY Daily News

Image courtesy of the NY Daily News

So how can we bring NFL owners to their knees to both lift the obvious blackballing of Kaepernick and get on the right side of history regarding police brutality? First, we have to accurately access whom we are up against. Righteous indignation and well-meaning passions are not substitutes for effective tactics. The 32 NFL owners are not just any part of the 1 percent. They are especially powerful among that 1 percent. To use the mafia analogy, these are MADE MEN and anyone that knows “the code” knows that going up against a “Made Man” often creates more problems than it solves. Because these men are extraordinarily powerful, any tactics used to bring them to their knees must be extraordinarily powerful, and the only one that I can think of would be the withholding of NFL player labor.

There is some recent precedent. When the University of Missouri football players refused to play until issues of institutional racism were acknowledged and addressed, then and only then did the college get serious about the issues. Can you imagine what would happen if even a quarter of the Black NFL players refused to play until Kap was back in the league and other larger issues regarding police brutality were addressed? Some of the very intractable issues that grassroots groups have been struggling to address would be done almost overnight. Keep in mind that during WW2, the Russians were US allies while the Germans, Italians, and Japanese were enemies. By 1950, within 5 years of the end of the war, the entire narrative flipped in the minds of the general public, as did foreign policy. The Russians became the enemies while the Germans, Japanese, and Italians became allies. Power can do whatever power wants to do, when it is compelled by a people’s movement to do so. The people with the most leverage in this case against NFL owners are the players.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports

The Demons of Sports Gambling are Dead

Thursday, May 17th, 2018

by Gus Griffin

gus

 

 

 

 

Image via Reason.com

Image via Reason.com

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 vote to strike down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act is a victory for sports “investors”. This opens the flood gates for legalized sports wagering in every state that chooses…….and rest assured most will. To think otherwise is to think that they will leave a trunk full of cash on the table.

For years, this issue has been haunted by the Demons of Sports Gambling, who are as follows: Addiction; Integrity; Sin. Let’s condemn all three to heaven…..I mean to hell, once and for all.

The Demon of Addiction insists that legalized sports gambling will increase the number of folks addicted, especially youth. This sinister troll from hell’s bunker totally misrepresents the essence of addiction, which is a form of self-medication. Since self-medication is its objective, it will engage in such behavior, be it through sports gambling, substance abuse, shopping, sex, or whatever other vice might be at its disposal. The continued suppressing of legalized sports only insures that another vice will be used.

Then there is the Demon of Integrity, which supposedly undermines the authenticity of the game. This abomination of truth is an outdated relic from the era when professional athletes were paid so little that most had to take off season jobs. Those days are long gone. Simply put, today’s professional athletes make so much money, to the point that they are virtually bribe-proof. In fairness, such is not the case for college athletes, and they would indeed still be vulnerable to this dishonest specter. But this is all the more reason to continue the movement to pay them as well.

The third Demon and arguably the most powerful is Sin. His powers are the broad default of the anti-sports gambling fringe. When his demon cousins of Integrity and Addiction fail, Sin is always there to pick up the mantle and be cited, even though most of his advocates cannot tell you exactly what the hell is wrong with a little sports action. Furthermore, a significant number of Sin’s advocates never miss Wednesday night’s church Bingo game. This Demon is but another example of how Sin has been unfairly tarnished for all of world history. If Sin were so bad, why do all of us indulge?

None of this is to say that there will be no victims of nationwide legal sports gambling. One will be the underground betting world, which has been primarily the domain of organized crime. By legalizing sports gambling, the worst the degenerate has to concern him with is a dinged FICO score or garnished paycheck. But he no longer must look over his shoulder for fear that Guido will break his knee caps.

The other loser will be off-shore gambling which has primarily taken place online. One report cites that one off shore entity currently gets 97% of its action from Americans.

But these are off-set by the projected $8.4 billion in new tax revenues and over $22 billion to the nation’s GDP. I’ll not cite the new jobs added because most will be minimum or non-living wage service industry jobs with little, if any, benefits. But still the math is in the black on this issue.

What is most frustrating about this issue is why the hell has it taken this long? We have a historical precedent called prohibition that made it crystal-clear that trying to suppress human urges by law NEVER work. In fact, the case can be made that by attempting to do so, one only increases whatever negative aspects of the behavior and activity that do exist. There is nowhere to go to resolve an unpaid, illegal bet. So let’s finally be adults and accept that folks are going to gamble…be it legal or illegal. The only reasonable plan is to bring the activity above ground, tax and regulate the inevitable.

 

Gus Griffin, for War Room Sports