Posts Tagged ‘POPSspot.com’

Genius Contained: Bernard King vs. Hubie Brown

Tuesday, April 9th, 2013

by Chuck Modiano

Part III of Bernard King: The NBA’s Invisible Genius

“Hubie, do I have the right to take the ball myself?” – Bernard King

For Knick and Golden State Warrior fans, King’s 1984 rise from star to sublime was not surprising or meteoric. Don’t call it a hot streak, Bernard had been there for years.

Lost Prime (1980-1983):

During King’s first three years in the NBA (1977-79), his only barrier was himself (see alcoholism and drugs). During his next 3.5 prime years (1980-83), his barrier was only 33 minutes and 16 shots per game. Bernard the Warrior needed a sacrificing point guard like Tiny Archibald or Dennis Johnson, but he got gunslinger World B. Free[1].  Bernard the Knick needed a coach like Phil Jackson, but he got superstar stopper Hubie Brown[2]. King should have been treated like Michael Jordan (23 shots per game), but until 1984 never got the scorer’s respect of Monta Ellis.

Lost Warrior (1980-1982): 

Outside of Golden State, Bernard rarely gets credit for two fantastic seasons with The Warriors. Despite being led the previous year by Robert Parish [HOF 2003], the team was pitiful, and Parish was traded. King was named “Comeback Player of the Year” in his first year, made the All-Star team in his second, and shot an astonishing 58% over both. Each year, the Warriors missed the playoffs by a single game. Why? King never took the most shots (see Free). Just how good was Warrior King? When San Francisco columnist Bruce Jenkins made up his all-time Warriors team a few years ago, his forwards were Rick Barry and Bernard – not Chris Mullin [HOF 2012].

“Bernard turned the Warriors franchise around. We went from 24 wins in ’80 to a winning record in ’82, the year Bernard became a starter.” — Pete Newell [HOF 1979]

Lost Knick (1982-1983):

When it comes to squeezing every last drop from mere mortals, Hubie Brown is a coaching genius. When it comes to teaching the game, there is none better. When it came to stopping superstars, he made Dean Smith’s North Carolina teams seem like the Showtime Lakers. Our greatest strength often doubles as our greatest weakness, and Brown was a unwavering “system coach” who called every single play, walked the ball up, and refused to budge from his signature 10-man rotation which he played every quarter. Yes, every quarter. What if Bernard was on fire? Too bad. Here comes Louis Orr!

“[King] was absolutely devastating in transition, which made it such a shame that he was stuck on Hubie’s plodding Knicks teams for those peak years.” – Bill Simmons, ESPN Writer

How Louis Orr Scored 100 Points:

On the day David Stern became the NBA commissioner, Bernard completed his famous back-to-back 50 point games. With two Knicks sidelined, Brown was finally forced to abandon his 10-man rotation, and Bernard dropped his 100 point combo meal on 40-58 shooting (note: Wilt’s shot 36-63 on his 100).  Had Bernard’s back-up Louis Orr not caught the flu, 50-50 would have never happened. Had Orr caught mono, the record books would have been shredded. King’s flu in Game 5 of The Showdown in Motown has become part of his legend, but Louis Orr’s flu is also a reminder of legend lost. Golden State and Knick fans knew that 1984 could have been happening for years. And now Hubie Brown knew: some birds you just can’t cage.

“The 50-50 games were the turning point as far as being noticed”.  – Bernard King

The Turning Point (January 1984):

Bernard began January 1984 by being named Knick captain and ended it with a 50 point game. While both dates are significant, the biggest turning point came in between. On January 13th, King took only nine shots – the Knicks fourth close loss that season where King had no more than nine shot attempts. The very next night King would score 42 points on 18-26 shooting, and Bernard would never shoot less than 10 times again (save injury). After 3.5 prime years, King would finally receive 40 minutes and 20 shots. January 14 is also the very same day when King’s 30 points @60% for 40 games was born. The turning point wasn’t 50-50, it was 40-20.  Bernard didn’t really change — Hubie did. But there would be flashbacks.

“Put Bernard back in the game!” and “Get the ball to Bernard!”
– This author and 10,000 fans at my first Knick game in 1983

Hubie’s Last Stand (April 1984)

Scene:           1984 Playoffs, Knicks vs. Pistons, Knicks Huddle
Act:                 #5 – The deciding game of historic series
Time:              36 seconds left in regulation, Knicks ball
Score:             Knicks 112, Pistons 111
Context:         Bernard King is Shredding History

This is crazy. This is crazy. This is crazy. Via Dennis D’Agostino’s must-read “Garden Glory”, let Bernard tell it:

“We were in a timeout, and the play was designed for Billy Cartwright. I’ve never questioned the coach’s authority… You just don’t question the coach. The coach is the coach, and you’re a player. But Hubie was designing a play for Billy Cartwright, and the game was on the line…. Well, I had a problem with that [King laughs.] Here I am playing with two dislocated fingers and I’ve averaged 40 points a game for five games, so if the game is on the line, give me the ball. That’s always been my history as a player, so I couldn’t understand in that intense moment how the play could be designed for anyone else.”

So… I said: ‘Hubie, do I have the right to take the ball myself?’ And he didn’t answer me. Then I spoke up even louder, ‘Hubie! Do I have the right to take the ball myself?’ I was emphatic. Finally, he looked up at me and said, ’Yeah’.  Because what I was saying… was ‘Hubie, I’m gonna break your play’. But I had to ask first; I’m not the type of guy to break a play in my professional career. I always did what was designed for me to do, so I had to ask the question before I could actually do it.”

These were Bernard King’s working conditions.

Imagine if Michael was denied that chance to shoot over Craig Ehlo? Would that ever happen? With Jordan gone in 1994, Scottie Pippen [HOF 2010] was averaging just 24 points on 41% shooting in his playoff series when coach Phil Jackson called the last shot for Toni Kukoc. Pippen famously refused to go back in the game.

In contrast, the surreal huddle exchange reveals both a phenomenal handling by Bernard, and a glaring flaw within Hubie. But it also arguably exposes a lesser flaw within King. For Bernard – who learned his work ethic and coach deference under legendary Brooklyn take-no-crap disciplinarian Gil Reynolds [see Genius Explained] — it took King until that moment in that huddle in that series to respectfully demand to be treated like the superduperstar he had been for years.

When Phil Jackson joined the Bulls, Michael Jordan was just a little less deferential. Jordan said:

“He’s the coach, I’ll follow his scheme, but I don’t plan to change my style of play. I’m sure everything will be fine if we win, but if we start losing, I’m shooting.”

Just how long would Jordan have lasted in Hubie’s 10-man rotation?

Today, Bernard and Hubie have a great mutual respect for one another, and Brown often speaks with great reverence for King’s “professionalism” and how he “never broke a play”. But what if King didbreak more plays? What if he was a little less professional, and a little more like Mike? Would his teams have won more games?  When does “playing the right way” become the wrong way?

One clue is when your star is shooting 60% and can’t be stopped. For younger Knick fans, it is when coach Mike D’Antoni asks Carmelo Anthony just to “fit in” as stretch spot-up shooter while he hands Jeremy Lin the keys to the Knicks. Had Anthony just went along to get along, he and the Knicks would likely not be flourishing today. Bernard’s growth cannot be separated from Brown changing, and  Carmelo’s can’t be separated from D’Antoni leaving (and Mike Woodson arriving). Sometimes the boss is wrong.

That Game 5 playoff timeout huddle has been the story of Bernard King’s career. He has been kindly asking for permission for his genius to be recognized ever since, and this week the Hall of Fame looked up and said “yeah”.

Oh yes. Back to Game 5.

After the timeout, King took the pass, demonstratively waved off Bill Cartwright from the post, and went down the left side for one of his patented baseline jumpers for his 40th point. Isiah’s subsequent 3-pointer would now only send the game into overtime instead of sending the Knicks home.

“In that 4th quarter and into the 5th quarter, Bernard King would just not let us lose”
– Hubie Brown

 

Chuck Modiano of POPSspot, for War Room Sports

 

I.   “Who is Bernard King”: The NBA’s Invisible Genius
II.   
Genius Unchained: Bernard King vs. Isiah, Larry, and History 
III.  Genius Contained: Bernard King vs. Hubie Brown
IV.   Genius Explained: Bernard King vs. Youtube (coming Wednesday)
V.     The King of Peers: Bernard King vs. Media (coming Thursday)
VI.   The Jordan Rules: Bernard King vs. Michael Jordan (coming Monday)

 

Genius Unchained: Bernard King vs. Isiah, Larry, and History

Tuesday, April 9th, 2013

by Chuck Modiano

Part II of Bernard King: The NBA’s Invisible Genius

“What he did to us I had never seen before. We caught him in the middle of a three-year stretch where he was playing better than any small forward in the history of the game.” –Isiah Thomas

Bernard King — The NBA’s Invisible Genius —  is also playoff legend. In his first two seasons, he led the Knicks to back-to-back first round upsets. In his very first Knick playoff game against the Nets in 1983, King scored 40 points on only 21 shots, and when he took at least 20 shots he scored 40 points seven times in eleven chances. Only once did Bernard exceed 27 shots. His two epic 1984 series against the Pistons and Celtics caught the NBA nation by storm, but the local explosion began in January.

King’s 40 game-stretch of 30 points on 60% shooting highlighted by back-to-back 50 point games was the result of an offensive genius who was finally given permission to display his artwork [see Genius Contained]. At a time when ESPN was covering rugby, King’s 40 game stretch got little attention, but his legendary post-season work is well-known. Instead, King’s playoff legacy has been hijacked.

Isiah Hijacks Bernard in 94 Seconds: You have seen the video clip. Isiah Thomas puts on a 94-second performance for the ages by sending the deciding game into overtime. Even though Isiah lost the duel (44-35), game (127-123), and series (3-2), he still won the war. Today, “16 points in 94 seconds” trumps Bernard’s historic series average of “42 points on 60% shooting”. Only Jerry West and Michael Jordan have ever surpassed 40 points in a playoff series, but neither could approach 60% shooting.

“I’ve never seen any one player dominate a team like King. There is no way to stop him.” —Dave Bing [HOF 1990]

Michael Hijacks Real Flu Game: What if you wrapped up the “Flu Game” by Jordan, “The Duel”  by Bird and Wilkins, and added a dash of Willis Reed? Then you get Bernard battling Isiah in Game 5 with a 102 fever and mangled hands that were getting freeze-sprayed throughout the game. In Jordan’s famous 1997 “Flu Game”, he scored 38 points on 48% shooting. In Bernard’s Flu/Duel/Freeze-Spray Game he topped Jordan with 44 points on 65% shooting. There would be no pictures of an old-school King bending over or being held up by his teammates — only his legendary game face. Jordan’s game ranks #2 in ESPN’s 25 best playoff games since 1978. King missed the cut. On to the Celtics.

“He had splints on both of his middle fingers, both dislocations… Bernard is ill and can’t come to the shootaround. They’re feeding him intravenously… Now, we can’t hit him on the break because he can’t dribble with the pain in his hands. So we’re thinking, how the hell are we going to win with this guy?”  – Hubie Brown [HOF 2005, Contributor]

Celtics Hijack Bernard: Watch the tapes: they literally hijacked him. They fouled him. They smacked him. They mugged him. You don’t think those Celtics played rough? Watch tape of Larry Bird leveling Bernard just a couple of years earlier. Lebron couldn’t relate, and Kevin Durant would snap in two. Now watch Larry just walk away. Not even a “my bad”. Watch Bernard dust himself off. No problem. That was basketball in the 1980’s before sports media turned every minor NBA scuffle into The Watts Riots.

“One guy would foul you, and the foul is already called, and then two other guys would hit you.  And that’s a fact.”  – Bernard King

 The Bitch Is Back: Before and during the series, those Celtics talked smack:

“He ain’t getting 40 on us. We’re going to stop the bitch.” — Cedric Maxwell [Retired Jersey, 2003]

“They’re in the grave, and we’ve got the shovel in our hands”.  — Kevin McHale [HOF 1999]   

King would drop 43 and 44 in Games 4 and 6 and bring some humility back to Boston for Game 7:

“Nothing Max and I tried to do worked.” – McHale

“We held him. We pushed him. We were draped all over him. The guy was just unreal.” — Maxwell

King vs. Hall of Fame East Wing: The 1984 Celtics played four Hall-of-Famers in their prime and their 5th best was a former NBA Finals MVP [Maxwell]. All of Bernard’s fellow starters would have been Celtic back-ups. That’s not conjecture. Guard Ray Williams — the Knicks third leading scorer at 15 points per game – became a Celtic backup the very next season and averaged only 6.4 points. Larry Bird couldn’t make Ray better.

In Game 7, Bird would turn in a stellar 39-point triple-double, King would get leveled early by Robert Parish, and the Celtics would move on and beat The Lakers for the championship. Bird’s Game 7 and series was treated by media as proof of Bird’s edge over King while few asked: “What if Bird and King swapped teammates?”

 “The best thing about having that series over was saying goodbye to Bernard King… If they had gotten by us, they would have had a good shot at a championship” – Larry Bird

King vs. Bird: Before Lebron James was born, Bernard King and Larry Bird were raising the small forward position to new heights. Both were named Most Valuable Player in a split-decision: the media chose Larry and players and coaches chose Bernard [see King of Peers]. So it was fitting they would meet. Well, they sort of met.

For seven games Bernard can be seen chasing Larry all over the court while King received tag-team beat-downs from Maxwell and Mchale.  Bird was left to “guard” an aging Truck Robinson, and float like a free safety.  Anyone who has ever played a hard game of pick-up basketball – let alone a grueling NBA series — understands this advantage.  Often missing from media analysis was how Bird’s hall-of-fame teammates made him better – especially defensively [see King of Peers]. Few asked: “What if Larry had spent his energy guarding Bernard?”

“I didn’t guard Bernard. I knew I had no chance guarding Bernard.” – Larry Bird

King vs. “The Winner Myth”: In their first five seasons, Wilt, Michael and Lebron all put up prolific numbers – except for wins. During his only five seasons without Oscar Robertson or Magic Johnson, same goes for Kareem.  Kobe after Shaq had a 3-year hangover before help came. ALL these legends had losing seasons, and only once during those 23 seasons was 50 wins exceeded. As for the Knicks, Willis Reed and Walt Frazier were definitely winners (must read: When the Garden Was Eden), but they needed each other. In their six seasons apart, the Knicks never had a winning record.

“At the end of the day, rings don’t always define someone’s career.” – Lebron James

King vs. Ewing’s Ghost: Patrick Ewing is also a winner and owns a phenomenal unsung achievement: his Knicks advanced in the playoffs for eight consecutive years. The handful of legends to match this all had superior teammates. Sadly, King and Ewing would only start one game together — the 1991 All-Star Game. Bernard’s astonishing return to All-Star status with a new knee, new team, and new game (post-up to face-up) came six years later. Think about that.

Just how many Knick championships were lost during that time? In his senior year at Georgetown, a swarmed Ewing opened up the floor for his teammates while averaging only nine shots per game –fourth most on the team. We already know how close King came with Billy Cartwright as his #2. With Bernard, Ewing gets to keep his Russellesque role, and both men experience career firsts: single-man coverage. Today, HBO would be running Knick documentaries called “When the Game was Theirs”. After finally getting The Hall call today, King reflected:

“The only regret I have is that [Ewing] and I didn’t team together. Because I believe in my heart of hearts that we would have won a championship.”. — Bernard King

 

Chuck Modiano of POPSspot, for War Room Sports

I.   “Who is Bernard King”: The NBA’s Invisible Genius
II.   
Genius Unchained: Bernard King vs. Isiah, Larry, and History 
III.  Genius Contained: Bernard King vs. Hubie Brown
IV.   Genius Explained: Bernard King vs. Youtube (coming Thursday)
V.     The King of Peers: Bernard King vs. Media (coming next Friday)
VI.   The Jordan Rules: Bernard King vs. Michael (coming next Saturday)

 

Who is Bernard King?: The NBA’s Invisible Genius

Tuesday, April 9th, 2013

by Chuck Modiano

G – Magic 
G – Isiah
F – Larry
F – Bernard
C – Kareem/Moses

No last names are necessary.

These men make up the 1st team All-NBA stars in Bernard King’s last two Knick seasons before he blew out his knee in March 1985 – the same year he led the NBA in scoring. This is the company King kept.

In 1984, King would produce a half-season scoring tear never duplicated in NBA history; upset the Pistons in the greatest playoff series performance in NBA history, and almost single-handedly upend the 1984 Celtics — one of greatest teams in NBA history.  In 1984, Bernard could be found in dated Converse commercials, rap songs, and Sports Illustrated covers which bowed to “His Royal Highness”.

With an unstoppable Carmelo Anthony balling like its 1984, and reports of Bernard’s induction into the Naismith Hall of Fame, The Invisible King will receive another bow this week.

While starving King fans will naturally celebrate, something just isn’t right. King’s 15 minutes of crumbs come too little, too late – 15 years to be exact.

We could only hope this week will help jump-start the only real NBA debate. Bernard’s rightful place in the Hall of Legends.

Where did The King stand amongst the greats? Let’s ask them

“Bernard King was the toughest matchup of my career. And I say that from the heart.” – Julius Erving [HOF 1993]

“Bernard King… is the best forward in the league, hands down”.  – Larry Bird [HOF 1998]

“We are just in awe of Bernard” — Isiah Thomas [HOF 2000].

Now consider that Larry and Isiah’s praise came before the 1984 playoffs and epic Showdown in Motown where

KING AVERAGED 42 PLAYOFF POINTS ON 60% SHOOTING!

No other player in NBA history has ever averaged over 40 playoff points on 60% shooting in the playoffs – not Wilt in ‘62, not Jerry in ‘65, and not Michael in ‘88.  Not Kareem, Shaq, Kobe, or Lebron.

Only Bernard King.

King also did it while battling Isiah, the flu, and mangled hands.

Afterwards, King was asked about his “hot streak”. Bernard asked back:

“At what point is it no longer considered just a roll?”

Answer: The rest of your life Bernard. The rest of your life.

King’s perceived eruption on a national stage was no hot streak.

What happened right before it was even more historic, but never documented until now:

IN 1984, KING AVERAGED 30 POINTS ON 60% SHOOTING FOR 40 STRAIGHT GAMES! [1]

Lebron and Carmelo, please read that again.

No other player in NBA history has likely ever matched this half-season stretch [2].

In the playoffs, the unstoppable King simply took more shots. That’s all.

For the few mesmerized souls who watched those games on WWOR Channel 9, King’s “30@60for40” validates that we aren’t suffering from nostalgia gone wild.

Bernard King was who we thought he was.

Unlike Knick legends Patrick Ewing, Walt Frazier, and Willis Reed, no one more than Bernard transforms grown Knick fans into babbling children, gets stuffy 50 year old accountants to jump around like Spike Lee, and elicits reactions of: “I swear I saw Jesus in shorts”. No, not “Black Jesus” ala Earl Monroe’s other nickname — just “Jesus”.

Truth be told, here is what many Knick fans in bars swear to this very day: at his pre-injury peak Bernard King was a better small forward than Larry Bird and a greater scorer than Michael Jordan.

If that sounds crazy to you, please consult his peers again:

“I have never feared anybody that I’ve played against – Bird, Magic, Doctor, Michael – and I respect and love all of those guys… Bernard King is the only guy that ever scared the hell out of me.”  – Dominique Wilkins [HOF 2006]:

Listen to Dominique. Few in media will publically utter such words for fear of ridicule or straight-jacket. But we are not the crazy ones.

It is the rest of the sports universe that has gone insane.

Unless long dead, there is no other athlete in any sport whose gap between greatness and recognition is larger — even after this week.

The humiliations are endless.

Will Bernard make the Hall of Fame this year? Should King have made the NBA’s 50 greatest players list? Will the Knicks finally retire his iconic #30 jersey?

The questions themselves demean NBA history. What about media?

In February, Lebron had six straight games of 30 points on 60% shooting, and ESPN.com lost their efficient minds, but no mention of King. Last year ESPN issued its 25 greatest playoff performances since 1978, and no King again. Sorry B, your 42 @60% and legendary Game 5 just weren’t dominant enough.

In 1984, The New York Times closely chronicled King’s nuanced brilliance in “Mysterious Moves” and “Never a Knick Like Him””, but on the 25th anniversary of that magical season, another small forward stole the show with a 10,000 word profile: Shane Battier:  “The No-Stats All-Star”.

What about the greatest player in Tennessee history, half of the famed Bernie and Ernie Show, and legendary Kentucky killer? When Kentucky coach John Calipari told his 2010 team that Bernard was talking pre-game trash in Tennessee’s locker room, the youngsters responded:

“Who is Bernard King?”, ”What number is Bernard King?”, and  “I’m guarding him?”

Ouch!

How did we get here?

Is there some vast hide-King conspiracy? Not quite, but corporate interests have reduced the NBA’s Golden Era to “Magic vs. Bird”, and lesser victims include Kareem, Julius, Moses, Isiah, and the great small forward of the 1980’s.

Bernard’s knee injury alone doesn’t explain it either. No one adds up career stats for Sandy Koufax, Gale Sayers, Earl Campbell, or Bill Walton. We know what happened to them.

Reasons for King’s vanishing includes playoff-lore hijackings by Isiah, Larry, and Michael [see II: Genius Unchained]; his unspectacular style, his early-career substance abuse, his forgotten Warrior years, his teammates, and his plodding coach Hubie Brown [see III. Genius Contained].

It also involves a dysfunctional Hall of Fame and sports media largely incapable of recognizing historic greatness without historic teammates. Despite being voted Most Valuable Player by their peers, King (1984), young Michael (1989), and Lebron (2006) were all denied those awards by media, and had their status as “winners” questioned. Where players see lack of support, media perceives lack of maturity, but only a lack of imagination could deny King as champion beside Patrick Ewing [see V: The King of Peers].

King’s past has been forgotten, a healthy future rarely imagined, but most of all, his present genius was never fully realized too far beyond his own peers, local fans, and a few journalists [3].

Bernard’s game was historically unique, but he often gets lumped into a sea of history’s high-volume scoring forwards. While The Tennessee Terror stormed on the NCAA scene with 42 points in his very first game as a freshman, his truer legacy can be found in his nation-leading 62% shooting.

Lebron James is receiving great credit for shooting 56% this year, but King shot 56% over a 5-year pre-injury prime (1980-85) and did it without any all-star teammates. The playoffs are where shooting percentages go to die (see Karl Malone), but King shot a stunning 58% in 18 Knick playoff games. Only the greatest ones maintain accuracy against playoff defense — our very best test for “unstoppability” across eras.

King also defied every selfish scorer stereotype. He was not a one on one player, never needed isolations, never took bad shots, and did it all within the game’s flow. He was a scoring scientist whose quick release, midrange mastery, and disciplined shot selection have gone the way of Kareem’s skyhook [see IV: Genius Explained].

King also suffered from a pre-Jordan era where it was thought impossible to score like Mike, but win like Magic. If Jordan is any indication, Bernard was too unselfish. Jordan had more athleticism, style, and shot attempts, but not accuracy [see VI: The Jordan Rules].

Today, Bernard is mostly remembered for his 60 points on Christmas Day, and scoring 50 points on back-to back nights in 1984. Mr. Hot Streak has now become Mr. Hot Game, and The King of Efficiency has been largely reduced to Jamal Crawford – a career 41% chucker.

Before Lebron’s February outburst, the last great scoring streak came from Kobe Bryant in 2004. Back then, Scoop Jackson tried to educate the youth when he asked the obvious:

“What’s up with the love? [Bernard] had scoring stretches that lasted seasons, not just games.”

Jackson continued:

“He was a genius interrupted… The universal love that evaded his career was found scrolled inside a book penned by his peers.”

Jackson’s question was ignored, so a decade later the kids want to know:

“Who is Bernard King?”

Have a seat son and move over Mr. Battier, King’s invisible genius must be explained.

II.   Genius Unchained: Bernard King vs. Isiah and Larry (coming Tuesday)
III.  Genius Contained: Bernard King vs. Hubie (coming Wednesday)
IV.   Genius Explained: Bernard King vs. Youtube (coming Thursday)
V.     The King of Peers: Bernard King vs. Media (coming next Monday)
VI.   The Jordan Rules: Bernard King vs. Michael (coming next Tuesday)

Or you can always just ask his peers:

Man, Bernard King, he was the truth.”  — Bob McAdoo [HOF 2003]

 

Chuck Modiano od POPSspot.com, for War Room Sports

[1] Beginning on January 14, King scored 1219 points (482-808) over the next three months spanning 40 regular season games (ending right before regular season’s final meaningless game before the playoffs)

[2] It is highly unlikely that King’s 40 games of 30 points on 60% shooting has been duplicated – even when factoring eFG. The highest FG% for a 30 PPG season is Kareem Abdul Jabbar who scored 32 points on .577 shooting in 70-71 and an incredible 35 points on .574 shooting in ’71-’72. Adrian Dantley also scored 30.3 points on 57% shooting in ’81-’82.

[3] Many journalists have helped keep King’s memory alive. Special thanks to Ira BerkowDennis D’Agostino, Bobbito Garcia and Ali, Alan Hahn, John Hareas, Scoop Jackson, Bruce JenkinsBill Simmons, Dave Zirin, and others.

White Quarterback II: Why Rex and Caleb are More Employable Than Donovan McNabb

Monday, October 15th, 2012

By Charles Modiano

 

 

 

 

 

Donovan McNabb is still seeking an NFL job, and never before in NFL history has a quarterback so accomplished found himself so suddenly unemployed. In quieter news, 31-year old quarterback John Beck made the Houston Texans team despite an 0-7 career record with a 67.6 passer rating. In the NFL, there are no white versions of McNabb’s free-fall or African-American versions of Beck’s remarkable life preserver. There are also no Black Tim Tebows or White Vince Youngs (out of league despite 31-19 starter record). After five years of failure, Alex Smith’s redemption is positively heartwarming — until you realize he can only be white. Hasn’t McNabb earned Smith’s respect?

In the famous Harvard study“Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal?”, resumes with White-sounding names received 50% more callbacks than identical resumes with Black-sounding names. As McNabb awaits callbacks, exactly how and why Rex Grossman and Caleb Hanie became more employable than Donovan McNabb in 2010 and 2011 demands a fuller explanation. Unlike the 2010 seasons of Alex and Troy Smith (out-of-league), these resumes aren’t quite identical. A closer look at Rex’s rise and Caleb’s climb not only reveals an NFL system of white privilege for quarterbacks, but more significantly[1], it reflects how hidden forms of employment discrimination  routinely operate across America.

How did we get here? Houston head coach Gary Kubiak explains his hiring of John Beck:

“[Beck] gives us some security here. He knows our system moving forward.”

Yes, John Beck knows Gary Kubiak’s “system”. Here is why:

As a longtime assistant coach, Gary once learned “the system” under head coach Mike Shanahan with The Broncos before he hired Mike’s son Kyle to help employ “the system” with The Texans before Kyle left to join Dad to teach “the system” to Beck with The Redskins. In April, Beck was cut by Mike, but still learned “the system” just well enough to be signed two weeks later by his friend Gary.

Did you get all of that Mr. McNabb?

While Donovan’s critics like to unfairly obsess over each under-thrown pass [2], his alleged demise has been falsely exaggerated by any objective measure or historical comparison. McNabb completed 19 of 24 passes in his final game played (with two drops), his 2011 passer rating surpassed 15 other starting QB’s, and his last two teams combined for an 8-21 record after he left

While his 2011 break with The Minnesota Vikings can be reasonably justified [3], the choices by coaches Mike Martz and Mike Shanahan were both indefensible and instructive. However, the minds of Mike and Mike tell an interwoven NFL story about the power of “genius” white coaches, “sticky” Black stereotypes, and a complex system of white privilege.  Lets review:

 

1) “The System”: Why Mike Martz Chose Caleb Hanie

Following the 2011 season, longtime Chicago Bears General Manager Jerry Angelo was fired, and celebrity Offensive Coordinator Mike Martz “resigned” at the end of his contract citing “philosophical differences” with head coach Lovie Smith. Here is why: After quarterback Jay Cutler suffered a season-ending injury, the 7-3 Bears allowed undrafted and untested Caleb Hanie to steer their playoff ship although he had never started a single NFL game. As Hanie insurance, The Bears also picked up Josh McCown who had been out of the league and coaching high school football. 

How did these men become qualified? They both knew Mike Martz and his offensive “system”[4]. Meanwhile, McNabb requested his Vikings release with the very specific hopes for a Chicago homecoming. To many Bears fans, the low-turnover McNabb running a ball-control offense on a defense-first Bears was an absolute no-brainer — just not the brain of Mike Martz.

Knowledge of Martz’s system trumped actual skill, and head coach Lovie Smith[5] made the mistake of deferring to Martz – the man who once gave Smith his first defensive coordinator position a decade earlier. As the former Offensive Coordinator of the 1999 Super Bowl Champion Rams, Martz had been credited as the architect and “genius” behind of “The Greatest Show on Turf”. By 2001, Martz became the Rams head coach and notably gave the Super Bowl away to the underdog Patriots. In Too S’Martz for His Own Good, the late great Ralph Wiley wrote:

These would-be football geniuses kill me. Don’t they kill you?

They come along now and then, like Mr. Mike Martz. Before the game teaches them the basic humility needed for any martial art, you can almost hear ‘em thinking, “Oooo, my system is so smooth. Oooo, lookit. I made separation. I made open space. I. I. I. My scheme is so sweet.”

Know who’s next in line? Spurrier. And we encourage them. Media types. “Brilliant scheme. Yada-yada.”

…Because you knew the Rams would throw it.

That ain’t genius. It’s ego, run amok.

Genius in football is simpler than that.

It’s not exploding receivers out of set like quail out of a covey.

In football, genius is simple: Do what they don’t expect you to do.

If they expect you to run, pass. If they expect you to pass, run.

Ten years later, genius in football was as simple as picking Donovan over Caleb Hanie.

But Martz never learned.

While the Rams Hall-of-Fame talent like Kurt Warner, Marshall Faulk, and Isaac Bruce could turn countless coaches into Einstein, Caleb’s  familiarity with Martz’s “system” produced four straight abysmal losses low-lighted by an anemic 41.8% QB rating – half that of McNabb in 2011.

Why did Martz believe he could turn Hanie into Kurt Warner?: Because he still believed he turned Warner into Warner! Speaking of the former stock boy turned MVP, Martz remarked“You all know the story about the grocery clerk, right?”  Warner wasn’t “Cinderella”, that was Martz. 

Distracting media discussions on Martz “system” replaced a very simple question: If Denver coach John Fox can completely overhaul his career-long system in a single week to accommodate a 46.5% passer named Tebow, why can’t Mike Martz adjust his for a 6-time all-pro?

Hadn’t McNabb earned Tebow’s respect?

Instead, the “system” has indirectly become one of the NFL’s greatest systems of white privilege that rewards quarterback-ups and has-beens. Predominantly white coaches create systems that often reward predominantly white quarterbacks, their past personal relationships, and the perceived ability to employ their playbooks. This perceived ability comes at a cost frequently chronicled by Black Athlete Sports Network and The Starting Five. BASN’s  Gary Gray asks:

“Over 65% of college quarterbacks are African American. What happened? Do these men forget how to play the position when they enter the pro level?”

TSF’s Michael Tillery also sees a systemic problem:

“The system of evaluating quarterbacks should be based on merit and not what our perception of what a quarterback should be.”

The great irony is that adherence to “the system” is often a statement on the coach’s own intellectual inability to adapt to player talent.  McNabb agrees:

“I thought the Bears would call. So many people continuously talked about the Mike Martz offense… If you want to win and win now, you go out and get a better quarterback and you cater your offense to his strengths, and obviously the strengths of your team.”

Unfortunately for McNabb, Martz was not alone. Sticky stereotypes from his previous year with The Redskins may have also come roaring back. On talk radio, the refrain went a little something like this: “Well if McNabb can’t even grasp the rigors of Shanahan’s two-minute drill, then how will he pick up Martz’s complex playbook!”

2) “Sticky Stereotypes”: Why Mike Shanahan Won the War

The root of Donovan McNabb’s downfall began with Kyle Shanahan – the Redskins Offensive Coordinator who never really wanted him. Kyle shared Martz’s inflexibility and sense of entitlement, but not his resume.  As a poster boy for affirmative action, Kyle obtained all four of his coaching jobs through his Dad by the age of 30. 

Kyle would sour on McNabb almost immediately in 2010, and prefer Rex Grossman because he knew Kyle’s “system” from their previous year with the Texans. Like Martz, Kyle either wouldn’t or couldn’t adapt to fit into McNabb’s superior strengths, as Eagles coach Andy Reid once did for McNabb, and then once again for Michael Vick. Kyle’s flaws and family ties would quickly become Donovan’s burden.

Humiliation #1: Rex Grossman ”gave us the best chance to win”. 

The Washington Redskins were 4-3 in 2010 and head coach Mike Shanahan famously benched McNabb at the end of a winnable game in favor of Grossman who fumbled the game away on first play. Kyle likely made initial benching call.  Afterward, ex-coach  Tony Dungy reacted:

“If I’m Donovan McNabb, I’m hot. I’m your starting quarterback. As a coach, I can’t take you out of a game we have a chance to win if I believe in you.”

Humiliations #2 and #3: Too dumb and lazy

Instead of admitting his terrible error, Mike Shanahan humiliated McNabb twice more by criticizing both his mental and physical ability to run the 2-minute drill. Shanahan’s actions were strongly denounced by many former coaches and quarterbacks (see Jimmy Johnson and Terry Bradshaw). Critics called Shanahan’s actions “completely dumb” and “personal, intended to injure McNabb’s reputation”, and more charged that “the race card had officially been dealt” with “racial coding… [worthy of] firing a coach” as Shanahan “knowingly treated McNabb like a N-­—”. McNabb reflected back in 2011:

“When you start to challenge my intelligence, you’re gonna challenge my manhood, everything that I’ve been able to accomplish throughout the years, that’s disrespectful.”

But Shanahan did far more than challenge his intelligence — he challenged his long-term future employment prospects. Shanahan’s “reference” wasn’t just an individual attack – it was institutional. For an African-American quarterback in a league that has a long and continuing history of devaluing Black intelligence at the QB position, being essentially called “dumb” and “lazy” is like a felony conviction to be seen on all future job applications.

Never mind McNabb’s 92-59 record with the Eagles; his five NFC championship games; or that a closer look at Shanahan’s coaching career reveals far more “Trent Dilfer”[7] than “John Elway”. If Mike Shanahan questioned McNabb’s intelligence, then sports media repeats it, sports radio debates it, and then it becomes fact.

Humiliation #4: Shanahan chooses Beck over McNabb

Not long after Mike Shanahan declared he would only welcome McNabb as a “back-up” in 2011, he had automatically granted John Beck the opportunity to compete for The Redskins starting job with Grossman. Both Shanahans saw something very special in Beck. Kyle stood on a table in 2007 insisting Beck be drafted with the 11th pick, and Mike effusively praised him and stated: “I think the world of him”. Whatever Mike saw in Beck would trump McNabb’s 107 – 0 advantage in career wins.

Beck would go 0-3, the “Beck-Rexperiment” would produce a 6-13 record in 2010-11, and Shanahan would quietly admit defeat sans apology. He would cut Beck, and trade a bunch of Redskins draft picks for super-prospect-in-any-system Robert Griffin III. Mike would keep his job, keep his son, keep his ego, and possibly even restore his genius. RG3 might soon make all but McNabb forget:

Rex failed. Beck failed. Kyle’s system failed. Mike’s judgement failed. And no “system” will ever turn Rex or Beck into Elway.

Humiliation #5: League chooses Shanahan over McNabb

In this copy-cat league, McNabb’s past pass-ups justify future pass-ups. This writer displays the popular circular logic:  

“All I have to say is this, the Texans and Bears both lost their quarterback mid-season in 2011, and they still didn’t give McNabb a call. What does that tell you?”

Two simple explanations are Martz’s egomania and the decades-long Kubiak-Shanahan friendship, but that was not the author’s point. 

Hiring McNabb now must first require the mental capacity to acknowledge that the genius Mikes were dead wrong, and Donovan was right. Too many fellow GMs, coaches and complicit media members are incapable of drawing this conclusion, no matter how many stats, dumb decisions, or reels of Caleb Hanie videotape turn up. None of these facts are more powerful than their belief in the “genius white coach” – a myth enabled by a sports media that can’t seem to apply such labels to the Tony Dungys or Mike Tomlins[6]. 

The quarterback decisions of Shanahan and Martz weren’t merely “incompetent” — but constituted coaching malpractice. What if McNabb was white? What if Rex-Beck were Black? Is Martz just an equal-opportunity egomaniac? While we can and should ask these questions, the answers still miss the systemic point. Institutional racism is not about Martz or Shanahan.   It’s about the incredible widespread trust in their judgment which is inseparable from their own whiteness.

That’s why Donovan McNabb remains unemployed.

3) “It’s Bigger Than McNabb”: The Real Problem

“I’m not training to be a backup in this league. … I want to be the guy out there battling and going through the ups and downs. I want to be that guy.”

Many in media have argued that McNabb needs to get a “grip on reality” and tone down his lofty expectations of ever competing for an NFL starter position. But the quote above is not from McNabb, but John Beck who just naturally expects to receive what McNabb has spent a Hall-of-Fame career (see Jim Kelly) pursuing:

Respect.

The real problem is not with McNabb, but with those coaches, writers, and fans who have the audacity to expect more “humility” from McNabb than the John Becks. Donovan has eyes, and can see the suffocating white privilege all around him from John to Rex to Caleb to Josh to Kyle to Mike and at least 50 QB’s who know all about “systems” their arms can’t cash. He clearly sees that his accolades haven’t gained him half the line of credit of Kerry Collins or Todd Collins. McNabb sees all of this. The real problem in the NFL, sports media, and America is this:

Friends Trump Facts: McNabb never built up a “coach’s friends network”[8] like Beck. In America, 70-80% of all jobs are obtained through “networking” – the most common mass form of employment discrimination. This “hidden job market” produces “hidden white privilege” as bosses naturally tend to hire family, friends and others who look, think, and act like them. Kyle Shanahan is more rule than exception. I have also benefited from networking. I earned my very first job as a teen through my Aunt, my first career opportunity through my brother, and when I messed up like Kyle, I didn’t have my intelligence questioned.

System Trumps Skill: Caleb over Donovan is not abnormal.  In corporate America, “the system” is called “corporate culture” and “fitting in” to existing white cultural norms is preferred to maximizing the skills of more qualified employees of color. Whites are also more likely to have their specific individual strengths noticed and nourished (see Tebow). Studies also show that an African-American male with a Bachelor’s degree is just as likely to be unemployed as a white male with a high school diploma (slide #10). As a white college graduate, if I really wanted to identify with the employment barriers of college-educated African-Americans, I’d have to return my degree.

Stereotypes Trump Stats:  Shanahan’s stereotype – not McNabb’s resume – stuck like glue. Such stigmas and stereotypes do not stick equally (see Kerry Collins’ transgressions). Princeton studies also reveal that a white man with a felony conviction has an equal or better chance at employment than a Black man without one. As a white job seeker, if I really wanted to understand Black employment challenges, I’d have to mug somebody and do time first.

Ego Trumps Winning: Don’t coaches like Shanahan, Martz, and others  “just want to win football games”? No. Not quite. Ego-maniacal NFL coaches (which are most) want to win games, win their way, and receive the credit for the victories. I have also held jobs where only 30% of my skill set was being used, and my worth was being (mis)judged because my strengths were ignored. While incredibly frustrating, it still did not stop me from obtaining other jobs within my profession.

Conclusion:

In arguing the case of white quarterback privilege, the most common resistance has come through variations of the following “common-sense” question:

“In a billion-dollar enterprise, wouldn’t any team definitely hire the best quarterback that could help their team win?”

Problem #1 with the question: It assumes winning is always more valuable than whiteness as the face of a franchise. While elite talents like Vick, RG3, and Cam Newton will always find homes, Michael Tillery asks the opposite economic question“Is the fear Black quarterbacks will take over the league alarming enough there will always be resistance for the status quo to submit to their physical and mental prowess and unequivocally give them a shot?”

Problem #2 is sports history: The “wouldn’t any team help itself?” logic has long been an enabling tool in justifying discrimination. It once helped deny Black players from entering Major League Baseball as The Sporting News editorialized in 1945: “There is not a single Negro player with Major League possibilities.”  The white press, white fans, and owners at the time largely accepted this reasoning at the expense of pennants and millions in ticket sales (see Brooklyn Dodgers).

More recently, this question was turned on its head when the collective judgment of all 30 NBA General Managers refused to draft or sign Jeremy Lin because they subconsciously perceived stereotype before skill. In linking Asian to African-American stereotypes, David J. Leonard writes“Race matters when thinking about Lin’s recruitment (or lack thereof) out of high school and his path to the NBA, as race matters when talking about employment discrimination.”

In the intentional scenario, McNabb is being black-balled like Satchel Paige, Curt Flood, and Barry Bonds (see 2008) before him. In the unintentional scenario, McNabb is this year’s Jeremy Lin before the Linsanity. In either case, the racial impact is just the same (cue Jay Smooth).

Donovan McNabb is the story of employment discrimination and white affirmative action in America.

But just don’t tell John Beck “the system” is rigged. He believes he earned his job.

 

Charles Modiano of POPSspot.com, for War Room Sports

[1] Beyond stereotypes based on intelligence that discriminate against African-American QB’s, many have argued that stereotypes based on athleticism have discriminated against white players at “skill positions” – even if not near a McNabb level. Stereotype research suggests that this is also likely true to some degree. While anything less than a meritocracy at any position should be corrected, such bias would not be symbolic of any widespread racial discrimination that happens in the everyday lives of whites. Employment research indicates that people of color are discriminated against in all positions at every level. If for example, athletic stereotypes on physicality were preventing whites from gaining fair access to hard labor blue-collar jobs, then that stereotype would gain far greater importance. However, the exact opposite is true. White Quarterback Privilege is especially significant precisely because it mirrors institutional white privilege in employment prevalent across society that is founded on the notions of white male supremacy in intelligence and leadership. This real-world context is the foundation that inspired this article.
[2] McNabb often underthrows the ball when missing receivers, which visually appears far worse than sailing overthrows. This is a strength disguised as a weakness as missing low over high prevents interceptions (only two in 2011). This is one reason why McNabb has the second best touchdown-to interception ratio in NFL history (behind Tom Brady).
[3] Some have misused Christian Ponder’s promotion to Viking starter by head coach Leslie Frazier to indicate that McNabb was “beaten out” by a rookie. This is false. Ponder went 1-7 with a 70.1 passer rating, but was reasonably seen as a necessary investment in Ponder’s future growth for a non-playoff-bound team.
[4] Martz “system” was once helped bring the Rams a Super Bowl when he had Hall-of-Fame talent, but has never produced results in any other stops.
[5] The Chicago Bears firing of GM Jerry Angelo, but not of  head coach Lovie Smith suggests that the pivotal decision to stay with Hanie and pick up McCown was ultimately Angelo’s, and not Smith’s final decision.
[6] In contrast to Martz, Tomlin’s brilliance was displayed in his deference. As defensive coordinator in Minnesota, he ran a very successful 4-3 defense. While new coaches customarily change defenses regardless of player talent, Tomlin won a Super Bowl in large part by keeping The Steelers 3-4 defense under Dick Lebeau in tact.
[7] Shanahan’s legacy and “genius” is largely based on two Super Bowl Championships with John Elway and Terrell Davis – not the other 16 years that produced only one single playoff victory and artificially inflated regular season win totals due to the Mile High altitude. Shanahan’s away record while with Denver was under .500.
[8]Andy Reid – who has publically supported McNabb – was his only head coach in Philadelphia, so past head coaches are not scattered all around the league to rehire him.